The chart below gives information about the “Istanbul Promo plus” sales in 2007. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant
The chart shows how the “Istanbul Promo plus” sales changed in 12 months of 2007. Generally, it can be observed that the Promo plus sales began at 200 million in January, as being ended up at 190 million by the end of the year.
However, in the first period from January to March, there is a prominent upward trend that makes the sales' stats increase dramatically from 200 million to 350 million. But surprisingly, right after that the trend suddenly is broken and keep falling for the next 4 months. So that in July, the Promo plus sales stayed at about 110 million, which is less than 240 million compared with March. August sales recorded a significant rise back to January levels as figures nearly doubled, but this was not to last as they dropped again in September to the same level as they were in July. October came with a small extension of about 100 million Turkish lira in sales, after which sales values leveled off and remained relatively static over the last two months of 2007.
Overall, Promo Plus in Istanbul persisted moderately constant in 2007 as January and December sales were fairly equal. Also, sales were at their highest in March while the weakest sales figures could be recognized in July and September.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-12-23 | milothemilker | 67 | view |
2019-12-23 | milothemilker | 89 | view |
2019-12-23 | milothemilker | 84 | view |
2019-12-23 | milothemilker | 78 | view |
2019-01-06 | preet1994 | 67 | view |
- Some advocates argue that it is good to share as much information as possible, others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely. 78
- SOME PEOPLE BELIEVE THAT THERE SHOULD BE FIXED PUNISHMENTS FOR EACH TYPE OF CRIME. OTHERS, HOWEVER ARGUE THAT THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF AN INDIVIDUAL CRIME, AND THE MOTIVATION FOR COMMITTING IT, SHOULD BE TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT WHEN DECIDING ON THE PUNISHMENT.DISC 56
- The graph shows Underground Station passenger numbers in London.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- The chart below gives information about the “Istanbul Promo plus” sales in 2007. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The chart below gives information about the “Istanbul Promo plus” sales in 2007. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The chart shows how the 'Istanbul ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1041.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 216.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81944444444 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.83365862548 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39401098165 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 106.607317073 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 307.8 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.5029020302 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.666666667 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.44444444444 5.23603664747 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19319021386 0.215688989381 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0926906725947 0.103423049105 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0994296599202 0.0843802449381 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148555337081 0.15604864568 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0586325507145 0.0819641961636 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.