the graph below shows different sources of air pollutants in the uk from 1990 to 2005
The line graph indicates changes in the number of air pollutants released from different sources in the uk from 1990 to 2005.
Overall, the number of total air pollutants plunged in the 15-year period surveyed. In addition, while industrial and household activities produced the decreasing amount of polluted gases, the figure for transport sector fluctuated slightly around at one million tons all the way.
It is clear that manufacturing made up the vast majority of gas emissions in the uk. being about 5.5 million tons in the first year examined, the figure for industrial production was seen to decline significantly by over twofold to two million tons in 2005. Meanwhile, that of households sector, being no more than one million tons, had a fluctuation in downward trend to reach the number of 0.2 in the last year, ranking third-positioned in the chart. Additionally, the number of air pollutants from transportation hovered around at one million tons, holding the second position as compared with others in the period surveyed.
In general, the quality of air in the uk improved increasingly with the amount of total polluted gases dropping from seven million tons in 1990 to just over three million tons in 2005.
- the graph below shows different sources of air pollutants in the uk from 1990 to 2005 84
- The process shows the commercial production of fresh orange juice and orange juice from concentrate 73
- In many countries it is becoming more and more common to pay for things using mobile phone mobile phone apps Does this development have more advantages or disadvantages 89
- The diagram illustrates the process that is used to manufacture bricks for the building industry. 78
- The bar chars show the number of cars per thousand people in 5 different countries in Europe in 2005, 2009 and 2010 in comparison with the average number. 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, so, third, while, in addition, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1037.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1592039801 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86775249217 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.562189054726 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 300.6 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.3283205186 43.030603864 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.625 112.824112599 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.125 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 5.23603664747 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.282310281851 0.215688989381 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.143953837327 0.103423049105 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.181771253381 0.0843802449381 215% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.246362361832 0.15604864568 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.207894749951 0.0819641961636 254% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.