Topic: The charts below show the performance of spending on roads and transport in four countries from 1990 to 2005. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisions where relevant.
The chart gives information about the proportion of investment in infrastructure and transport in four nations, including Italy, Portugal, the UK, and the USA between 1990 and 2005.
As can be seen, it is apparent that the four countries underwent a downward trend in the percentage of investment in upgrading public transport and roads. In addition, Portugal spent the largest budget on infrastructure throughout the examined period.
Looking at the chart, Portugal took the lead in improving the quality of roads and transport, accounting for roughly 27% in 1990. This ratio was almost twice times as great as the percentage of the USA. In the following year, there was a sharp decrease in the proportion of Portugal by merely one-in-ten, and then continued to decline to around 15% in 2005. Making up a fifth, Italy was successfully becoming the second country to invest a huge amount of money in infrastructure in 1990. One year later, it witnessed a significant slum approximately one point five percent until 200 before rising again at the end of the period.
Turning to the USA, in 1990, the proportion of spending on roads and transport was pretty modest approximately 15%, and then experienced a slight fluctuation before recording pretty the same portion in the first year. Regarding the UK, making up over 10%, this nation showed the smallest investment to reinforce public transport and infrastructure systems. After rising a tiny portion in 2000, the ratio underwent a noticeable upheaval, plummeting to merely half and finally reaching around 7% in 2005.
- Some school leavers travel or work for a period of time instead of going directly to the university Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 84
- The graph shows the value in US dollars in millions of dollars of investment in funds of four categories from 1988 to 2014 73
- Fossil fuel is the main source of energy In some countries the use of alternative sources of energy is encouraged Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 73
- Topic The graph below shows the average house prices in 3 countries between the years 1997 2014 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The chart shows the number of travellers using three major airports in New York City between 1995 and 2000 84
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 256, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r. Regarding the UK, making up over 10%, this nation showed the smallest investme...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, if, look, regarding, second, then, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 33.7804878049 145% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 3.97073170732 277% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1325.0 965.302439024 137% => OK
No of words: 255.0 196.424390244 130% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19607843137 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97764062875 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 106.607317073 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56862745098 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 389.7 283.868780488 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.6887737013 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.454545455 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1818181818 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.63636363636 5.23603664747 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178871645545 0.215688989381 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0643269489146 0.103423049105 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0549840027119 0.0843802449381 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115850731299 0.15604864568 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0390112498822 0.0819641961636 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 40.7170731707 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 256, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r. Regarding the UK, making up over 10%, this nation showed the smallest investme...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, if, look, regarding, second, then, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 33.7804878049 145% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 3.97073170732 277% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1325.0 965.302439024 137% => OK
No of words: 255.0 196.424390244 130% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19607843137 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97764062875 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 106.607317073 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56862745098 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 389.7 283.868780488 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.6887737013 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.454545455 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1818181818 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.63636363636 5.23603664747 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178871645545 0.215688989381 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0643269489146 0.103423049105 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0549840027119 0.0843802449381 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115850731299 0.15604864568 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0390112498822 0.0819641961636 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 40.7170731707 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.