Some people think it is more important to spend money on roads and motorways than on public transport systems. To what extend do you agree?
In recent years, traffic jams have become more and more serious and occurred frequently, especially during rush hours, thereby solving this problem is one of the top priorities in nations worldwide. While there are some valid arguments that the government should invest the budget for roads and motorways rather than for transport infrastructure, I contend that both roads and public transport systems play an important role in modern society. Therefore, they should be equaled investment.
One major ground behind this rise of the opinion supporting building more sustainable roads and motorways is that this approach is likely to address the jam-packaged effectively in peak hours. This is because if the government allows the construction of more infrastructure in metropolitan areas, participants' traffic would have various ways to commute to work without suffering from being got held up in heavy traffic for a long time. In addition, police are conducive to regulating the traffic flow in many intersections, making the contribution to reducing the rate of traffic accidents. Therefore, inhabitants may feel safe when engaging in traffic due to increased the level of security. In Vietnam, for example, there is a myriad of accidents involved in the quality of main roads like big holes in streets, which lead to residents are fallen and being hurt on slippery roads.
Nonetheless, building extended roads and upgrading motorways is probably an immediate method. In the long run, the authority should take into consideration upgrading the public transport system. Due to the fact that environmental pollution raises concerns among countries around the world, encouraging the utilization of public transport not only decreases traffic congestion in metro cities but also improves air quality by filtering particulates out of the air. Furthermore, according to a recent study, noise becomes one of the primary factors resulting in the psychological disorder because of sleep disturbance. Consequently, in long term, it may have a negative impact on public mental health as well as bring down productivity at work.
In conclusion, although spending on building roads and making way for motorways brings several benefits for both residents and the police force, chances are that investing in public transport systems tackles multiple issues related to environmental pollution at a high level. Therefore, the government and dwellers should join hands in order to combine practicing both methods.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-18 | Huyenlbg87 | 89 | view |
| 2023-02-01 | tieuquynh | 89 | view |
| 2022-12-07 | thanhtu000 | 78 | view |
| 2022-09-10 | Charles Le | 78 | view |
| 2022-05-14 | paulha1107 | 73 | view |
- The charts below show the reasons why people travel to work by bicycle or by car 56
- The charts give information about two genres of TV programmes watched by men and women and four different age groups in Australia 78
- Even though governments have worked hard to bring about improvements in the healthcare system the overall standard of physical health in developed countries is decreasing What are the potential reasons for this and what are some of the long term effects 78
- Some school leavers travel or work for a period of time instead of going directly to the university Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 84
- Society is based on rules and laws It could not function if individuals were free to do whatever they wanted To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 357, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n of public transport not only decreases traffic congestion in metro cities but a...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, furthermore, if, may, nonetheless, so, therefore, well, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 41.998997996 136% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2124.0 1615.20841683 132% => OK
No of words: 384.0 315.596192385 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.53125 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4267276788 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99912729639 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 176.041082164 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598958333333 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 650.7 506.74238477 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 68.9779352805 49.4020404114 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.6 106.682146367 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6 20.7667163134 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.26666666667 7.06120827912 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203777793886 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0603069829244 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0717059080012 0.0667982634062 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128926065739 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0568814269964 0.056905535591 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.0946893788 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.09 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.65 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 78.4519038076 148% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.