The chart shows the number of travellers using three major airports in New York City between 1995 and 2000

Essay topics:

The chart shows the number of travellers using three major airports in New York City between 1995 and 2000.

The bar graph compares the figures for visitors passing through three major airports in New York City from 1995 to 2000.

In general, it is evident that while LaGuardia and Newark seemed to welcome an increasing amount of travelers throughout the examined period, the number of visitors to John F.Kennedy fluctuated noticeably. It is also important to note that 1997 witnessed a sharp increase in the number of travelers to two less popular airports, making John F.Kennedy become the most flavored airport among the three.

Starting at the highest point in 1995, LaGuardia welcomed the highest number of travellers, standing at 35 million. Until 1999, each year this airport welcomed more than 5 million travellers steadily. Noticeably, at the end of this period, in 2000, the number of tourists coming to LaGuardia increased dramatically, to nearly 70 million.

In contrast, Newark airport had the lowest number of passengers, with 15 million, accounting for only two-thirds of the total number coming to John F.Kennedy. However, while the next coming years saw a reliable increase in the number of passengers departed in Newark, the opposite was found in John F.Kennedy, in which the total number of passengers increased from 25 million in 1995 to 45 million in 1997, before dropping to 30 million in 1999.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-01-26 hoang tuan minh 67 view
2022-10-17 Dieu linh03 61 view
2022-10-07 tieuquynh 84 view
2022-09-19 Hanabi view
2021-10-21 Khanhu010101 73 view
Essays by user tieuquynh :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 176, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Kennedy
...eriod, the number of visitors to John F.Kennedy fluctuated noticeably. It is also impor...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 344, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Kennedy
...wo less popular airports, making John F.Kennedy become the most flavored airport among ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 339, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sed dramatically, to nearly 70 million. In contrast, Newark airport had the lowe...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 151, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Kennedy
...ds of the total number coming to John F.Kennedy. However, while the next coming years s...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 302, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Kennedy
...ewark, the opposite was found in John F.Kennedy, in which the total number of passenger...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, so, third, while, in contrast, in general

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1105.0 965.302439024 114% => OK
No of words: 213.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18779342723 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71867066455 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 106.607317073 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586854460094 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 313.2 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.2053776668 43.030603864 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.125 112.824112599 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.625 22.9334400587 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244539077302 0.215688989381 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116899375902 0.103423049105 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0918322265202 0.0843802449381 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172973500121 0.15604864568 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105003532512 0.0819641961636 128% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.2329268293 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.