The charts give information about two genres of TV programmes watched by men and women and four different age groups in Australia.
The bar graphs compare the figures for Australians of two genders and four different age groups watching two genres of TV shows.
In general, it is apparent that the older generation has a tendency to enjoy both reality shows and game shows, while the younger generation prefers watching the former program. It is also notable that Australian women watch reality shows much higher than men, while games shows are flavored almost equally by both genders.
Looking at the figures by gender, the percentage of females watching reality shows accounted for 70 percent, which almost doubled the proportion of males. In addition, the proportions of games shows watched by both genders were nearly the same, at approximately 60%.
Turning to the age groups, the percentages of both TV shows watched by the youngest groups were the same, at 50%. The age groups 25 to 34 as well as 35 to 44 watching reality shows made up 60% and 65%, respectively, while the figures for game shows were lower, accounting for nearly 40% of people aged 25 to 34. Meanwhile, the oldest groups watching each type of TV shows were fairly similar, standing at 70%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-06 | Wardiati Yusuf | 67 | view |
| 2023-10-08 | RIYA MODI | 78 | view |
| 2023-06-27 | thuthanh206 | view | |
| 2023-06-27 | thuthanh206 | 56 | view |
| 2023-02-17 | tieuquynh | 78 | view |
- Topic Today different types of robots are developed which are good friends to us and help us both at home and work Is this a positive or negative development 89
- Topic Some people think scientific research should focus on solving world health problems Others think that there are more important issues Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- Some people think that good health is a basic human need so medical services should not be run by profit making companies Do the advantages of private health care outweigh the disadvantages Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples fr 89
- Topic The charts below show the performance of spending on roads and transport in four countries from 1990 to 2005 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisions where relevant 84
- The charts below show reasons for travel and the main issues for the travelling public in the US in 2009 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, look, so, well, while, in addition, in general, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 953.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9378238342 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52442762592 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559585492228 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 273.6 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.4065965507 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.125 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.125 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 5.23603664747 162% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207791081383 0.215688989381 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112328835359 0.103423049105 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.1011830369 0.0843802449381 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157260256533 0.15604864568 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.122568374083 0.0819641961636 150% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.