A number of tertiary course require
student to undertake a period of unpaid
work at an institution or organisation as
part of their programme.
On one hand, it enhances their further understanding of subjects that they have been taught at university; on the other hand, it provides an opportunity to gain working experience at the organization where they were assigned to volunteer. Furthermore, to provide service to communities or help disabled person to live better, encourage volunteers to be socially responsible people, which increase their competitive advantage and employability.
However, according to recent researches, unpaid internship experiences do not seem to give college students much of a leg up and are waste of time when it comes to look for employment. Statistics shown that more than half of paid interns under their belt received at least one job offer, which was twice as formal unpaid interns. This situation was even worse in terms of salary. Among students who found jobs, former unpaid interns were actually offered less money than those with no internship experience. Moreover, researches also indicate that less unpaid interns received job offer as the conclusion of their latest internship than paid interns, and even if volunteer jobs do occasionally turn into permanent job opportunities, it is relatively rare.
In conclusion, I am convinced that conducting an unpaid work as a compulsory course in tertiary institution is not in the best interest of students. In order to ensure this course fulfilling an important educational purpose, I suggest they should be given more flexibility to choose between paid work and unpaid work.
- The bar graph below shows the amount of carbon emissions in different countries during three different years. 73
- In many countries average life expectancy is increasing 11
- The bar chart below gives information about the percentage of the population living in urban areas in the whole world and in different parts of the world 73
- The bar chart gives information about the number of library books borrowed from Lammertown Public Library in 1991 and 2001 and the pie chart gives information about the library's membership in 2010 78
- We are becoming increasingly dependent on computer based technology 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, furthermore, however, if, look, moreover, so, as for, at least, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 20.0 5.60731707317 357% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1285.0 965.302439024 133% => OK
No of words: 239.0 196.424390244 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37656903766 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93187294222 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01632724899 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 106.607317073 151% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.673640167364 0.547539520022 123% => OK
syllable_count: 406.8 283.868780488 143% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 1.53170731707 392% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 4.33902439024 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.2615830107 43.030603864 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.777777778 112.824112599 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5555555556 22.9334400587 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.4444444444 5.23603664747 238% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.120341598512 0.215688989381 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.049415260695 0.103423049105 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0533147655164 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0877871813686 0.15604864568 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.041509685293 0.0819641961636 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.2329268293 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 61.2550243902 60% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.3012195122 142% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.22 11.4140731707 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.75 8.06136585366 121% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 40.7170731707 179% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.