Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment; only governments and large companies can make a difference.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Environmental protection is one of the most heavily debated topic worldwide. Because of increasing population, industrialization and many other factors, our environment is in grave danger. Some believe that without the government and large companies, people can do nothing to improve the environment. In my opinion, I disagree. I believe both parties should be equally involved to make a difference.
To better understand we need to understand what is endangering our environment. Some of the common causes include increasing population hence increasing the demand of houses to be built hence cutting down forests and trees. Also increasing industrialization means more factories thus releasing greenhouse gases into the atmosphere. Similarly more dependence on cars also increases air pollution levels. There is also a tremendous increase in the amount of plastic waste which end up in ocean waters hence endangering marine life.
So, to be able to combat such a large scale problem, all means should be used. Individually people can start by making small changes in their daily life activities which overtime can lead to a big change in the environment. For example, reducing the use of plastic materials or planting trees and plants around their homes. Also making sure to dispose off plastic items into recycle bins if available. People can also educate their neighbors and friends about environmental problems and its importance.
On the other hand, government and large companies must play their roles as well. By setting strict regulations on factories and car companies about gas emissions, funding education projects for the public, providing recycle bins around the cities and monitoring them regularly.
In conclusion, to bring a change in environment both people and governments plus large companies need to go hand in hand. Only then can we expect a real and long-lasting improvement.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-17 | subodh | 84 | view |
| 2020-01-17 | kingdangyeu0606 | 84 | view |
| 2019-12-27 | Maleeha | 84 | view |
| 2019-11-19 | chioma49 | 67 | view |
| 2019-11-18 | Mario Nese | 84 | view |
- Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment; only governments and large companies can make a difference.To what extent do you agree or disagree?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. 84
- The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six-month period in 2011.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 81, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: Some
...nd what is endangering our environment. Some of the common causes include increasing popula...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 225, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...t hence cutting down forests and trees. Also increasing industrialization means more...
^^^^
Line 5, column 333, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Similarly,
...g greenhouse gases into the atmosphere. Similarly more dependence on cars also increases ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 170, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ges in their daily life activities which overtime can lead to a big change in th...
^^
Line 9, column 194, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...activities which overtime can lead to a big change in the environment. For examp...
^^
Line 9, column 327, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...ng trees and plants around their homes. Also making sure to dispose off plastic item...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, if, similarly, so, then, thus, well, for example, in conclusion, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1625.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.48986486486 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06845296188 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.618243243243 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 504.0 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.8561627317 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.5263157895 106.682146367 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.5789473684 20.7667163134 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.78947368421 7.06120827912 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179530203543 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0512851244581 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0629104426642 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0980924571032 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0470789403165 0.056905535591 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.