Children are generally more successful in foreign language studies than adults. Thus, it is better to learn languages in childhood. Do you agree or disagree?
According to the Bible after the tower of Babel had been destroyed, people were forced to study to understand one another. Many pedagogical books claim that the early study of a second language effects on the children beneficially. I agree with the opinion the youngsters need to be taught the elements of the non-native language as early as possible.
Everyone knows the fact that the baby’s brain absorbs more information than in all lifetime. By the age of five, children receive lore and skills that they use and develop all their adulthood. We can provide little ones an initial knowledge of a foreign language during this period, because the brain will easily learn new information. For example, my son lived in the atmosphere of two languages since birth and then studied English faster than classmates at school. Thus, the early tuition of another speech helps school students to develop their knowing better.
Moreover, studying foreign language at an early-age facilitates the perception of three or more of them then. Variety languages of a same group own the similar derivations and equal definitions. Bilinguals feel the subtleties of a second language as a mother tongue, and can catch the same specifics in a third one. For instance, all little people of international families familiar to me successfully explore three or four languages at school or university. Suchwise, simultaneous familiarization with two cultures gives children a chance to easily investigate more types of languages.
In conclusion we can say that teaching a foreign language to young ones will support them in the future. This will let them quickly and effectively discover and deeply understand several of them.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-29 | SUSANNA PETROSYAN | 67 | view |
- Nowadays genetically modified food is widespread all over the world While proponents of GM crops ensure that these foods are safe for human consumption and help to increase food supplies others argue that their effects on health have not been studied long 73
- Some people enjoy change and they look forward to new experiences Others like their lives to stay the same and they do not change their usual habits Compare these two approaches to life Which approach do you prefer Explain why 73
- Many scientists and linguists predict that all people will choose to speak the same global language in the future How far do you agree or disagree with this prediction Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge 84
- People today know fewer of their neighbors than in the past Why is this What can be done to solve this problem 89
- People naturally resist making changes in their lives What kind of problems can this cause What solutions can you suggest Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 92, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: of
... facilitates the perception of three or more of them then. Variety languages of a same ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, second, so, then, third, thus, for example, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 13.1623246493 23% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1442.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 275.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24363636364 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88696128387 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610909090909 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 450.0 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 17.5106316911 49.4020404114 35% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 96.1333333333 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3333333333 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 7.06120827912 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.284104145674 0.244688304435 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0860360998806 0.084324248473 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0457260522699 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155012862703 0.151304729494 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0547388746539 0.056905535591 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.