The main purpose of public libraries is to provide books, and they should not waste their limited resources and space on providing expensive hi-tech media such as computer software, videos and DVDs.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Reading at libraries is an integral and crucial part for the formation of an educated and versatile person. Technologies as known have affected tremendously on the way people learn new things and they have redefined the concept of a library in recent days. Although a belief exists that the introduction of advanced technologies with the active use of electronic media is a waste of budget and time, I do not agree with this point of view.
On one side, plethoras of libraries avoid using computer-based technologies in preference to printed books as the principle information carrier. Some people suppose that having the latest hi-tech media might deviate the society from the actual goal of coming, providing the destructive environment at libraries. Moreover, an opinion exists that computer monitors negatively impacts the human’s general welfare, in particular loss of vision is observed. As per the issue «How brain works» by Dubinin V.A., reading of a printed text enables a person stay focused for a longer time span as the body burden is minimal. Thus, libraries are recommended to adhere to customary use of typed editions and to strive to prevent utilizing of telecommunication technologies excessively.
On the other side, technical equipment promotes to attract more youth through rooting of interactive component. The information transmitted through the medium of the audio-visual materials facilitates to absorb the data more efficiently. For instance, according to the poll conducted by the Vienna University, people are revealed to be more involved into the exploring the theme if the read text is accompanied by the computer-based video. Thereby, latter-day libraries need to embed more up-to date technologies for expanding the readers’ base.
Summing up, notwithstanding the traditional approach to using printed literature only at libraries, it should be considered as an obsolete one. The transformation of public libraries would convert them into more beneficial to readers and researchers as they could work as centers for interactive learning and knowledge sharing. To my mind, public libraries require implantation of latest developments in IT-sphere for easing the process of acquiring the themes.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-01-05 | VietAn97 | 61 | view |
| 2021-11-06 | Le Minh Anh | 84 | view |
| 2021-02-15 | SUSANNA PETROSYAN | 89 | view |
| 2020-05-23 | prempro | 67 | view |
- The government s investment in arts music and theatre is a waste of money Governments should invest these funds in public services instead To what extent do you agree with this statement 84
- Email is a fast and convenient way to communicate and written letters aren t needed anymore To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 57
- Some people prefer to work for a large company Others prefer to work for a small company Which would you prefer 70
- Some people think that it is important to have a single language as an international official language. Others think that it will make it difficult to identify countries and would cause a loss of culture.What are your opinions on this? 89
- Some people think it is a good thing for senior managers to have much higher salaries than the other workers in a company To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 546, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...logies for expanding the readers’ base. Summing up, notwithstanding the traditio...
^^^
Line 4, column 379, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'of the latest'.
Suggestion: of the latest
..., public libraries require implantation of latest developments in IT-sphere for easing th...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, so, thus, for instance, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1893.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 343.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.51895043732 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18512552454 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615160349854 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 605.7 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.5653566799 49.4020404114 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 126.2 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8666666667 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.4 7.06120827912 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143946108273 0.244688304435 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.042587952895 0.084324248473 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0407163562588 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0830317066754 0.151304729494 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0354602145224 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.48 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 125.0 78.4519038076 159% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.