There are a lot of things one needs to know in order to evaluate the efficacy this move by the government. To begin with the basics, it is important to know just how high is the Vitamin A content in this new breed of millet and if it is actually effective in curbing the problem of deficiency. Moreover, it is also important to find out how many people are deficient in Vitamin A and whether this move for curbing deficiency is, in fact, that pressing. Additionally, information of millet consumption by the people divided into buckets gender-wise and economic status-wise will be helpful in the analysis to triangulate in onto the group where this move can cause the most impact. If this identified group does not intersect with the group that is deficient in Vitamin A, then, this exercise is not beneficial at all.
Another important aspect of this argument is the effect on the farmer and agricultural activities in the nation. Important information on the effects of cultivation this crop on the soil health and labour requirement is important. Long term deterioration of other resources due to this move will result in problems for the people associated with agriculture. This is important in evaluating whether the subsidy incentive is enough for the farmers to start cultivating this crop. On the other hand, it is equally important to know if the subsidy incentive is so high that this consumes a large part of the agricultural sector due to its profitability such that cultivation of other crops is hit severely.
It is also important to consider where is the fund for the subsidy rolling in. It is possible that funds from other more vital government activities are cut by this move. This deficiency issue should be weighed in importance against other government activities that may be hit because of this.
Even if we consider that everything goes well, we are still remained with the issue of the adoption of this millet variety by the common person. It is pressing to find out if this variety of millet varies significantly from the popular one in price, taste and availability. If people are not willing to adopt this new variety at all then all efforts are futile. Another consideration for adoption is knowing whether nutritional value of the standard variety is preserved in the new breed in addition to more Vitamin A.
Knowing these will help the government make an informed call on the move that has been suggested.
There are a lot of things one needs to know in order to evaluate the efficacy this move by the government. To begin with the basics, it is important to know just how high is the Vitamin A content in this new breed of millet and if it is actually effective in curbing the problem of deficiency. Moreover, it is also important to find out how many people are deficient in Vitamin A and whether this move for curbing deficiency is, in fact, that pressing. Additionally, information of millet consumption by the people divided into buckets gender-wise and economic status-wise will be helpful in the analysis to triangulate in onto the group where this move can cause the most impact. If this identified group does not intersect with the group that is deficient in Vitamin A, then, this exercise is not beneficial at all.
Another important aspect of this argument is the effect on the farmer and agricultural activities in the nation. Important information on the effects of cultivation this crop on the soil health and labour requirement is important. Long term deterioration of other resources due to this move will result in problems for the people associated with agriculture. This is important in evaluating whether the subsidy incentive is enough for the farmers to start cultivating this crop. On the other hand, it is equally important to know if the subsidy incentive is so high that this consumes a large part of the agricultural sector due to its profitability such that cultivation of other crops is hit severely.
It is also important to consider where is the fund for the subsidy rolling in. It is possible that funds from other more vital government activities are cut by this move. This deficiency issue should be weighed in importance against other government activities that may be hit because of this.
Even if we consider that everything goes well, we are still remained with the issue of the adoption of this millet variety by the common person. It is pressing to find out if this variety of millet varies significantly from the popular one in price, taste and availability. If people are not willing to adopt this new variety at all then all efforts are futile. Another consideration for adoption is knowing whether nutritional value of the standard variety is preserved in the new breed in addition to more Vitamin A.
Knowing these will help the government make an informed call on the move that has been suggested.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-29 | mrigimunjal | 59 | view |
- Before pouncing on the suggested move, it is important to scrutinize what has been presented here. A thorough analysis of certain points will help the Production Company in taking an informed decision about the next fortiuous strategy. 35
- Television station moved towards more national news instead of local. After receiving complaints, they want to revert. 49
- Many lives might be saved if inoculations against cow flu were routinely administered to all people in areas where the disease is detected. However, since there is a small possibility that a person will die as a result of the inoculations, we cannot permi 63
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers. 50
- A nation should require its students to study the same national curriculum until college. 70
Comments
Essay evaluation report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.5 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 18 15
No. of Words: 416 350
No. of Characters: 1990 1500
No. of Different Words: 190 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.516 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.784 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.779 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 135 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 110 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 75 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 53 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 23.111 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 7.156 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.556 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.314 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.56 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.093 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 255, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nt is important. Long term deterioration of other resources due to this move will...
^^
Line 13, column 275, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...r one in price, taste and availability. If people are not willing to adopt this ne...
^^
Line 13, column 398, Rule ID: NON_ACTION_CONTINUOUS[3]
Message: The verb know is usually not used with a continuous form, use the simple form instead. Suggestion: 'knows'
Suggestion: knows
...ile. Another consideration for adoption is knowing whether nutritional value of the standa...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 398, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...ile. Another consideration for adoption is knowing whether nutritional value of the standa...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, if, may, moreover, so, still, then, well, in addition, in fact, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 30.0 19.6327345309 153% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.9520958084 46% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 11.1786427146 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 13.6137724551 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 37.0 28.8173652695 128% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 65.0 55.5748502994 117% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 16.3942115768 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2041.0 2260.96107784 90% => OK
No of words: 416.0 441.139720559 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90625 5.12650576532 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51620172871 4.56307096286 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82309292957 2.78398813304 101% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 204.123752495 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.466346153846 0.468620217663 100% => OK
syllable_count: 657.9 705.55239521 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 4.96107784431 222% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 8.76447105788 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.70958083832 111% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.22255489022 71% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 19.7664670659 91% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.8473053892 101% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.6180457061 57.8364921388 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.388888889 119.503703932 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1111111111 23.324526521 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.22222222222 5.70786347227 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.25449101796 76% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.20758483034 158% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 6.88822355289 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.67664670659 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.488612186043 0.218282227539 224% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.162063716594 0.0743258471296 218% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.1570094804 0.0701772020484 224% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.236187889715 0.128457276422 184% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.167879978044 0.0628817314937 267% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 14.3799401198 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.3550499002 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.197005988 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.5979740519 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.32208582834 98% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 98.500998004 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 12.3882235529 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.1389221557 101% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.9071856287 118% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.