The chart gives facts about the daily TV use by children in various countries, plus the
proportion finishing 3 levels of education.
Regarding hours per day watching TV, the USA, Canada and the UK have the highest hours at
4. China and Italy are the next highest with 3, Brazil and India stand at 2 each, and Malta and the UAE
have only 1 hour per day, which is a quarter of the maximum recorded.
Turning to academic achievement, we see that 100% of children completed school in Italy,
Canada and Malta. The other countries are all in the 90’s, except India which is 80%. High school
completion ranges from 100% in Malta to levels in the 90’s (Italy, Canada, UAE) and the 80’s (UK,
USA and Brazil.) China and India have the lowest levels, with 68% and 60% respectively. For
University completion, the UK has the highest level at 39%, followed by Canada (32%) and the USA
(29%.) Italy, China and Brazil are all in the mid 20% range. The lowest figures here are for Malta
and the UAE (18% and 19% respectively) and finally India with only 12%.
In summary, TV use and education levels vary widely. It is noticeable, though, that the
countries with the highest hours of TV per day are also those with the highest % levels of University
attainment.
- The older generations tend to have very traditional ideas about how people should live, think and behave. However, some people believe that these ideas are not helpful in preparing younger generations for modern life.To what extent do you agree or disagre 61
- The line graph below in the amount of coffee exported from three countries between 2002 and 2012 53
- Nowadays, distance-learning programs have gained in popularity, but some people argue that courses can never be taken as good as those by attending a college or university in person. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
- Every government has a duty to provide free health care for its people What are the advantages and disadvantages of government providing free healthcare 80
- The graph below shows the consumption of three spreads from 1981 to 2007.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, regarding, so, in summary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 6.8 235% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1051.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 224.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.69196428571 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86867284054 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45108592714 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.535714285714 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 308.7 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.4244842867 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.5833333333 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6666666667 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.33333333333 5.23603664747 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 14.0 3.83414634146 365% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.09268292683 244% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167797607859 0.215688989381 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0623756158052 0.103423049105 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0536139685729 0.0843802449381 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0603006282242 0.15604864568 39% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0544010792924 0.0819641961636 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.92 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.91 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.