The bar chart compares the number of men and women in further education in Britain in three periods whether they were studying full-time or part-time. Units were measured in thousands.
Overall, what stands out from the chart is that both the majority of men and women students preferred to study full-time education instead of part-time.
Looking at the details, in 1970/71, the figure for full-time was leader in both sexes with 1000 males and just under 600 females. The number of people who tended to study part-time among males and females was a small proportion, with 100 and 50 respectively. In 1980/81, the situation changed oppositely in the number of men while the figure for females witnessed a slight increase. In 1990/91, the number of female students who studied full time reached its peak at approximately 1100 students. The proportion of part-time students increased slightly in 20 years period, from 1970 to 1990, and saw its highest level in 1990 in both sexes with around 200 people.
- Doing an enjoyable activity with a child can develop better skills and more creativity than reading. To what extent do you agree? Use reasons and specific examples to explain your answer 89
- the diagram below shows the process of milk production 56
- Nowadays, distance-learning programs have gained in popularity, but some people argue that courses can never be taken as good as those by attending a college or university in person. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
- The line graph below in the amount of coffee exported from three countries between 2002 and 2012 53
- the map below show the village of stokeford in1930 and 2010 summarise the information and make comparison where relevant 68
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 438, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: fulltime
...e number of female students who studied full time reached its peak at approximately 1100 ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
look, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 838.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 167.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01796407186 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60928100769 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.604790419162 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 239.4 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.2277304453 43.030603864 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.75 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.875 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.375 5.23603664747 26% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.372447212546 0.215688989381 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.176585541083 0.103423049105 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.182734617075 0.0843802449381 217% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.334700111257 0.15604864568 214% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.163393363129 0.0819641961636 199% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.