Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
The debate on which more delightful, working only three days for long hours or working more days for shorter hours, has garnered a range of views. Nowadays, many are adamant that a myriad of elements should be taken into consideration to check the constructive and destructive facets of this issue. Some people posit that the pros of working three days outweigh the five days working advantages. On the other hand, some others take the opposite side and disagree. From my vantage point, I agree with the former group and aver that there are enormous benefits of fewer days of work. I feel this way for two reasons, which I will explore in the following paragraphs.
The first exquisite point to be considered is that fewer days of work means less stress; therefore, more productivity. As a result, the overall work satisfaction would increase remarkably. My personal experience is a compelling example of this. In the last year, I was working five days per week in a pharmaceutical company. However, this company has reduced the number of working days from five to only four days. Even though the workdays decrease one day, the statics show that productivity has climbed dramatically and the proportion of stress between employees has reduced in the company. For this reason, reducing the number of workdays would benefit the company and the employees.
Secondly, another reason which deserves some words to say is that working for just three days would cut the unemployment rate. Companies can fill open hours with new employees. A vivid example can shed light on this subject is from my sister's experience. My sister now is working in the customer service company, she started working to fill the open hours which resulted from reducing the number of workdays in the company. All in all, companies and institutions, that reduced the workdays to three or four days, is helping the community in decreasing the rate of unemployment.
To wrap it up, contemplating all aforesaid reasons, one can soon realize the importance of decreasing the workdays' number.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-11 | maryka72 | 60 | view |
| 2023-03-07 | Hibahtabbaa | 70 | view |
| 2023-02-27 | kevin1105 | 66 | view |
| 2023-02-26 | Hibahtabbaa | 60 | view |
| 2023-02-23 | can111 | 3 | view |
- Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Some young adults want independence from their parents as soon as possible Other young adults prefer to live with their families for a longer time which of these situations do you think is better Use s 70
- Some people think that students in single-sex schools perform better academically.Others, however, believe that mixed schools provide children with better social skills for adultlife. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 67
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is better to be a follower than a leader Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 60
- Underwater whales produce loud noises known as songs Scientists use whale songs to study the movements for migrations of groups of whales Recently scientists discovered something unusual a single solitary whale whose song is unlike that of all other known 71
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 37, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The debate on which more delightful, working only three days for long hours o...
^^
Line 9, column 436, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of workdays in the company. All in all, companies and institutions, that reduced...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, second, secondly, so, therefore, i feel, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 43.0788530466 53% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 52.1666666667 81% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1732.0 1977.66487455 88% => OK
No of words: 342.0 407.700716846 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06432748538 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75402587631 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.53216374269 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 524.7 618.680645161 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.9071617058 48.9658058833 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.1578947368 100.406767564 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.6045352989 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.57894736842 5.45110844103 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.265399375629 0.236089414692 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0863523213523 0.076458572812 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0861247011393 0.0737576698707 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1495355435 0.150856017488 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10387684499 0.0645574589148 161% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 11.7677419355 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.77 10.9000537634 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 86.8835125448 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.