The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone call in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995-2002. Summarise the information by selecting a reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar graph depicts the total number of minutes (in billions) that UK residents spoke on three categories of telephones during the period between 1995 and 2002. We can see that throughout the given period, local fixed line calls were the most popular. In 1995, local fixed lines were used to make telephone calls totaling to over 72 billion minutes whereas the duration of national and international fixed line calls was about half of this at about 37 billion minutes. Over the next years, the talk time of local fixed line calls increased and it reached its highest value of 90 billion minutes in 1999. Afterwards, it started falling. Even so, the total minutes of local calls in 2002 were the same as that in 1995. National and international fixed line calls also increased over the years but at a slower pace. While in 1995 national and international fixed line calls of 37 billion minutes were made, this figure reached 60 billion minutes in 2002. Mobile phones registered the highest growth in talk time over the years. Overall, there was no massive spike in the minutes of local fixed and national and international fixed line calls, but mobile calls shot up over the period from 3 billion minutes in 1995 to 45 billion minutes in 2002.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-03 | Saeedeamani | 56 | view |
- More and more people are migrating to cities in search of a better life, but city life can be extremely difficult.Explain some of the difficulties of living in a city.How can governments make urban life better for everyone? 73
- The use of mobile phone is an antisocial as smoking. Smoking is banned in certain places so mobile phone should be banned like smoking. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- As well as making money, businesses have to social responsibilities. to what extend do you agree or disagee? 56
- Some people say that too much attention and too much many resources are given in the protection of wild animals and birds. Do you agree or disagree about this opinion? 56
- Leaders and directors in an organization normally oler people.some people think younger leader would be better.do you agree or disagree? 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, so, whereas, while, even so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1027.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 216.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75462962963 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.83365862548 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36094316759 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.486111111111 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 316.8 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.2975985783 43.030603864 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.7 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.8 5.23603664747 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 3.83414634146 26% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227551513146 0.215688989381 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108403241516 0.103423049105 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0881619153123 0.0843802449381 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.227551513146 0.15604864568 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0819641961636 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.27 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.46 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum two paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.