The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in two years.

The pie charts depicts five different kinds of energy production in France in two different years.

Overall,at the beginning of the period other contributed least to energy production in France ,while coal was the most significant production.In comparison,at the end of the period coal became the largest proportion and lowest contribution which was made by other.

In 1995,gas production was 29.63percent and it increased 1.22percent. production from coal was 29.80percent in 1995 and it had a slight growth 1.13percent in 2005.at the beginning of the period,other and nuclear made up 4.90percent and 6.40percent of France energy production respectively,and these figures rose to 9.10percent and 10.10percent in 2005.

Petro,which always comprised almost 29.27percent of France production,fell to 19.55percent in 2005.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 8, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , at
...rance in two different years. Overall,at the beginning of the period other contr...
^^^
Line 3, column 94, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ted least to energy production in France ,while coal was the most significant prod...
^^
Line 3, column 143, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
...oal was the most significant production.In comparison,at the end of the period coa...
^^
Line 3, column 156, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , at
...ost significant production.In comparison,at the end of the period coal became the l...
^^^
Line 5, column 71, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Production
...63percent and it increased 1.22percent. production from coal was 29.80percent in 1995 and...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 81, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...and it increased 1.22percent. production from coal was 29.80percent in 1995 and ...
^^
Line 5, column 121, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... from coal was 29.80percent in 1995 and it had a slight growth 1.13percent in 20...
^^
Line 5, column 196, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , other
...t in 2005.at the beginning of the period,other and nuclear made up 4.90percent and 6.4...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 291, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , and
...of France energy production respectively,and these figures rose to 9.10percent and 1...
^^^^
Line 7, column 6, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , which
...rcent and 10.10percent in 2005. Petro,which always comprised almost 29.27percent of...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 70, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , fell
...almost 29.27percent of France production,fell to 19.55percent in 2005.
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 712.0 965.302439024 74% => OK
No of words: 119.0 196.424390244 61% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.98319327731 4.92477711251 121% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.30283395202 3.73543355544 88% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.58550857766 2.65546596893 135% => OK
Unique words: 72.0 106.607317073 68% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.605042016807 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 189.9 283.868780488 67% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 91.6502045824 43.030603864 213% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 142.4 112.824112599 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.6 5.23603664747 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 11.0 1.69756097561 648% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.296263418025 0.215688989381 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.189725627315 0.103423049105 183% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.230471065404 0.0843802449381 273% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.224707456604 0.15604864568 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.245772665575 0.0819641961636 300% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.6 13.2329268293 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.7 11.4140731707 155% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.16 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.