It is shown that meetings, training and discussions now happen online. Do the advantages of this trend outweigh its disadvantages?
In the contemporary world, thanks to the existing technological advancements, virtual meetings, training as well as discussions are becoming an indispensable part of our daily lives. From my perspective, the benefits of this trend far exceed its drawbacks.
On the one hand, conducting meeting and training sessions online may get engaged with several major disadvantages. Firstly, technical limitations are likely to be the irreversible sequel to unstable Internet connections of meeting participants. This is inextricably linked with the fact that individuals involved can lose track of the progress of the meetings, which assuredly brings about a low efficiency of the discussions. Moreover, video-conferencing members may be diverted the attention away from the content of the meetings by virtue of externally non-productive Internet activities. This indicates that there will exist a loss of personal interaction which is often considered to be an invaluable asset easily fulfilled by the physical presence.
On the other hand, I hold an unwavering belief that the merits of virtual discussions are much more significant. In the first place, it goes without saying that the widespread use of online video programs would diminish the time and costs regarding member transportation, hotel accommodation and so on. The things saved can be utilized as financial incentives for employees as well as for crucial aspects such as advertising. What is more, holding meetings virtually also facilitates the geographical barriers of participants. Irrespective of locations, individuals will be able to attend and give their own assessment, which endows enterprises the golden opportunity to implement the extension of the worldwide business.
To sum up, I am convinced that the plus points to people’s lives created by online meeting and training sessions undoubtedly outweigh the potential downsides. However, we must gain full-scale knowledge when and how much to make use of this trend so that we can offset the adverse effects to some certain extent.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-05 | quynhhtrangg2512 | 89 | view |
| 2019-12-18 | rookiewriter | 56 | view |
- The chart below shows the percentage of adults of different age groups in the Uk who used the Internet everyday from 2003 to 2006. 67
- The chart below shows the percentage of adults of different age groups in the UK who used the Internet everyday from 2003 to 2006. 78
- The following chart show the results of a British survey taken in 2009 related to housing preferences of UK people 89
- The graphs below show four categories of citrus fruits and the top three countries to which these were exported in thousand tonnes in 2012 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The use of social media is replacing face to face interaction among many people in society Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 723, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he extension of the worldwide business. To sum up, I am convinced that the plus ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, may, moreover, regarding, so, well, as for, such as, as well as, to sum up, what is more, in the first place, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1751.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 312.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.61217948718 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.32738466982 2.80592935109 119% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.641025641026 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 537.3 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.9220385995 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.071428571 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2857142857 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.5714285714 7.06120827912 164% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1263193315 0.244688304435 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0396538782649 0.084324248473 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0440710020713 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0864588279444 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0618233528793 0.056905535591 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.55 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.99 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.