The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie chart highlights information about the pivotal causes of land destruction around the globe, while the given table illustrated data regarding the effects of land degradation impacted on three geographical locations in the 1990s.
What stands out from the pie chart is that over-grazing takes place just almost under two-fifths, which is just slightly ahead of deforestation with a third. Other causes lead to a small fraction with 7% , whereas over-utilized in agricultural land results at approximately 28%.
In terms of the table, in the outcomes of land mutilation by regions during the 1990s, Europe encountered deforestation and over-cultivation with 9.8 and 7.7, which distinguished vastly in proportion than the others with just over a fifth. Nonetheless, Oceania ranked in second place with 13% as a consequence of over-grazing action, reaching at 11.3%. North America suffered small intake from this unlucky phenomena with around 5%.
Overall, the data in the result provided a large amount in difference.
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compari
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981,1991 and 2001.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- Some people think that parents should teach children how to be good members of the society. Others, however, believe that the school is the best place to learn this. Discuss both views and give own opinion. 61
- The diagram below show the stages and equipment used in the cement-making process, and how cement is used to produce concrete for building purposes.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The pie chart highlights information abo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ographical locations in the 1990s. What stands out from the pie chart is th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 230, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... causes lead to a small fraction with 7% , whereas over-utilized in agricultural l...
^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...land results at approximately 28%. In terms of the table, in the outcomes o...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... unlucky phenomena with around 5%. Overall, the data in the result provided...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, nonetheless, regarding, second, third, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 3.97073170732 277% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 881.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 158.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.57594936709 4.92477711251 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.54539209256 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18450224476 2.65546596893 120% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.677215189873 0.547539520022 124% => OK
syllable_count: 255.6 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.1134199076 43.030603864 149% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.857142857 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5714285714 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.14285714286 5.23603664747 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.12139275308 0.215688989381 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0511823259403 0.103423049105 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0600086395892 0.0843802449381 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0735362596254 0.15604864568 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0659179517165 0.0819641961636 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.2329268293 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 61.2550243902 80% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.38 11.4140731707 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.72 8.06136585366 121% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 11.4329268293 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.0658536585 145% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.