You should spend about 20 minutes on this task. Write about the following topic:
The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 and 2010.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The provided two pie charts represent an overview of the percentage of British students able to speak languages other than English in the years 2000 and 2010.
Overall, Spanish, Another language and Two other languages depicted an upward trend; whereas, No other language and french shown a downward trend, and German remained stable in the given periods.
Spanish only rose from 30% in 2000 to 35% in 2010, and it was the highest percentages of languages, which were spoken by Britisher students. Similarly, the percentage of Another language and Two other language increased by 5% between 2000 and 2010.
Meanwhile, No other language was the second highest language spoken by British students in 2000 and it was 20%, but it declined by 10% during the after ten years. An equally, French langawas spoken by 15% in 2000 and decreased to reach at 10% in 2010. As opposed, the percentage of German language remained constantly during the one decade and it was 10%.
- The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients, all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features,and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- The graph below shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country. 73
- Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legat requirement.To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their wast 67
- Scientists have been warning for many years about protecting the environment and that people must limit the use of energy in their daily lives. Despite warnings, many people do not do so. What are the reasons for this and how can people be encouraged to p 84
- The graph below shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country 64
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, second, similarly, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 807.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 162.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98148148148 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56762134501 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53751009377 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 87.0 106.607317073 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.537037037037 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 228.6 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.6387773216 43.030603864 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.285714286 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1428571429 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.42857142857 5.23603664747 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223277832993 0.215688989381 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118128007565 0.103423049105 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0586655112057 0.0843802449381 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153749211786 0.15604864568 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.057441270828 0.0819641961636 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.99 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.