Finland’s telephone calls, by category, 1995-2004
The given chart illustrates information on the quantity of minutes (in millions) of phone conversations by Finland’s residents from 1995 to 2004. Overall, times spending on telephone calls have doubled over the given period of time.
One of the first thing to note is that local landline calls were always the highest throughout the period, increasing rapidly from 12000 million minutes to just 17000 minutes between 1995 and 2001. Meanwhile, national, international landline had a moderate upward trend by just above 2000 million minutes during 9 years.
Compared to mobile calls’ figure in 1995, the popularity of mobile phones calling in 2004 was 50 times higher, specifically 200 million calling minutes to just below 10 billions minutes. On the other hand, national and international landline calls which were at the peak started to had a steady decline by 4000 million minutes after the last 3 years from 2001. Besides, national and international landline calls mildly increased from about 9000 million minutes to well above 10000 million minutes.
In general, the order of three categories has not changed but their quantities went up and down rapidly over the course of 9 years from 1995.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-09 | namanh232004 | 78 | view |
- In the future students may have the choice of studying at home by using technology such as computers or television or of studying at traditional schools To what extend do you agree or disagree 90
- Overpopulation of urban areas has led to numerous problems Identify one or two serious ones and suggest ways that governments and individuals can tackle these problems 78
- the consumption of fast food in UK 67
- Finland’s telephone calls, by category, 1995-2004 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The given chart illustrates information ...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 228, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...phone calls have doubled over the given period of time. One of the first thing to not...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...oubled over the given period of time. One of the first thing to note is that l...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... 2000 million minutes during 9 years. Compared to mobile calls' figure in...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... to well above 10000 million minutes. In general, the order of three categorie...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, if, well, while, in general, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1021.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29015544041 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71816849333 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616580310881 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 297.0 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.5967845327 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.625 112.824112599 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.125 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.375 5.23603664747 160% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.12637207164 0.215688989381 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0639095798236 0.103423049105 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0794278315212 0.0843802449381 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0914751445903 0.15604864568 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0789353770469 0.0819641961636 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.2329268293 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 11.4140731707 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.