The given table gives the information about the levels of poverty in six different categories of household in Australia in the year 1999. Overall, the poverty levels of single persons are more than that of couples. Single parent with children are more poor than couples. Aged peoples are likely to be least poor.
It is clear from the table that 11% that is about 1837000, Australians are living in poverty. Single aged person are more poor than aged couple that is 6% and 4% respectively.
Just over one fifth of the single parent without children are more poor than couple without. The same pattern is also seen in case of sole parent and couples with children. In sole parent the poverty levels were around 21% and in couple iit is about 12%.
- the bar charts below show the levels of participation in education and science in developing coutries and industrialised countries in 1980 and 1990 67
- The charts below show the number of Japanese tourists travelling abroad between 1985 and 1995 and Australia’s share of the Japanese tourist market.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below. 61
- The chart below shows the different levels of post-school qualifications in Australia and the proportion of men and women who held them in1999. 56
- The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries Cambridge 6 test 1 task 1 63
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The given table gives the information ab...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d peoples are likely to be least poor. It is clear from the table that 11% that...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ouple that is 6% and 4% respectively. Just over one fifth of the single parent...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 222, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ldren. In sole parent the poverty levels were around 21% and in couple iit is ab...
^^
Line 4, column 239, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rent the poverty levels were around 21% and in couple iit is about 12%.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 618.0 965.302439024 64% => OK
No of words: 132.0 196.424390244 67% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.68181818182 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.38956122427 3.73543355544 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.2369917817 2.65546596893 84% => OK
Unique words: 70.0 106.607317073 66% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.530303030303 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 189.9 283.868780488 67% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 22.4926829268 62% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.1724913544 43.030603864 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 68.6666666667 112.824112599 61% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.6666666667 22.9334400587 64% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.33333333333 5.23603664747 25% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 1.13902439024 615% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.13263628937 0.215688989381 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0600803238302 0.103423049105 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0999239116421 0.0843802449381 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0934463574777 0.15604864568 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0682118263629 0.0819641961636 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.9 13.2329268293 60% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.19 61.2550243902 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.27 11.4140731707 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.84 8.06136585366 85% => OK
difficult_words: 21.0 40.7170731707 52% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.9970731707 69% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.