The given line graph explains the consumption of fish and three different types of meat like chicken,beef and lamb in a European country in the time frame between 1979 and 2004. Overall, the usage of chicken is dramatically increased as compared to other meats like beef and lamp.On the other hand the consumption of fish remained relatively steady.
In 1979 the consumption of chicken is around 150 grams and through out the year the usage is raising rapidly and in 2004 the consumption is grams per person per week is about 250 grams. On the other hand the usage of lamp and beef shows a downward trend. From the graph it can be clear that at the beginning most popular meat used in the country is beef but after the years passed the consumption is decreased.
At last the amount of fish consumed remained almost same through out the period. at first the usage is 60 grams and at 2004 it is around 50 grams. Fish is the least meat preferred in that country
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004. 67
- The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries Cambridge 6 test 1 task 1 63
- the table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999 56
- The chart below shows the different levels of post-school qualifications in Australia and the proportion of men and women who held them in1999. 56
- the bar charts below show the levels of participation in education and science in developing coutries and industrialised countries in 1980 and 1990 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The given line graph explains the consum...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 140, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , beef
...ree different types of meat like chicken,beef and lamb in a European country in the t...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 320, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: On
...pared to other meats like beef and lamp.On the other hand the consumption of fish ...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of fish remained relatively steady. In 1979 the consumption of chicken is ar...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 100, Rule ID: THROUGH_OUT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'throughout'?
Suggestion: throughout
...tion of chicken is around 150 grams and through out the year the usage is raising rapidly a...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 366, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... that at the beginning most popular meat used in the country is beef but after th...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s passed the consumption is decreased. ...
^^^
Line 5, column 43, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... At last the amount of fish consumed remaine...
^^
Line 5, column 93, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... amount of fish consumed remained almost same through out the period. at first th...
^^
Line 5, column 100, Rule ID: THROUGH_OUT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'throughout'?
Suggestion: throughout
... of fish consumed remained almost same through out the period. at first the usage is 60 gr...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 124, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: At
...ed almost same through out the period. at first the usage is 60 grams and at 2004...
^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t meat preferred in that country
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, so, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 801.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.60344827586 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41106167296 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.511494252874 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 225.9 283.868780488 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.4518135602 43.030603864 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.125 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.75 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.625 5.23603664747 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 12.0 1.69756097561 707% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.326094789811 0.215688989381 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.142402425026 0.103423049105 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.120405425453 0.0843802449381 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.215292549862 0.15604864568 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0822485962193 0.0819641961636 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.4 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.67 8.06136585366 83% => OK
difficult_words: 22.0 40.7170731707 54% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.