Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? ‎ In today's world, it is more important to work quickly and risk making mistakes ‎than to work slowly and make sure that everything is correct.‎

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?

In today's world, it is more important to work quickly and risk making mistakes ‎than to work slowly and make sure that everything is correct.‎

In the modern era, working hard and continues is very important. Progress countries need hard ‎working more than everything else. Some people believe that it is important to work quickly and risk ‎making mistakes but In my viewpoint, working slowly and make sure that everything be correct is ‎more advantages. In follows, I will elaborate my opinion at some reasons. ‎

The first exquisite reason to be mentioned is economical aspects. When a work starting attention to ‎economical aspects is essential. Entrepreneurs don’t have unlimited money for their works. They ‎don’t accept high risk in their works. When a work start and doing quickly, not only it has a high risk and ‎make mistake but also it may waste the casts and bankrupt its investors. Hence working quickly could ‎distractive a project. My own experience is a complete parable in this case. When I was a collage ‎student I work in a construction project. I was one of the supervisor agents. We had two group of ‎workers who work two times, daily and night. Nighty group working slowly and have a good attention ‎to the project and We don’t have any mistakes, but daily workers working quickly and don’t have ‎exactnes. One day we had a trouble accident and one of the surface that they were concreted ‎collapsed suddenly. This event have bad effect and waste a lot of money in project. ‎

The second reason which is important is saving time. One of the important aspect at all works is the ‎time index. Never don’t imagine quickly work don’t save your time, vice verse it may waste your time ‎if you make only a mistake. Therefore, all work and important projects needs high accurate of ‎performance. For example, a recent‏ ‏report derived from German BMW company depicted that their ‎workers who working slowly have lower flowed in their products, whereas, workers with high speed ‎prodution have negative influance on the product. This report showed that quikly work have goten ‎twice time more than regularly other works. This company publishd more detailed things about its ‎workers, it emphasized that slower worker are patient persons and are success in their personal works ‎too. Therefore quikly work with low pericious could waste time of products.‎

In short, with aforementioned, altough some people and researcher claims that working quikly is ‎better, in my opinion working slowly with high accuracy is better actually. In one hand, this is a ‎economical method that reduce the cast risks at the other hand, this is a exactnes method that don’t ‎waste time and prevent of duplicated works. ‎

Votes
Average: 7.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-12 mohammad9090 76 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user mohammad9090 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 279, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ing slowly and make sure that everything be correct is ‎more advantages. In follo...
^^
Line 3, column 67, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “When” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... to be mentioned is economical aspects. When a work starting attention to ‎economica...
^^^^
Line 3, column 391, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...e the casts and bankrupt its investors. Hence working quickly could ‎distractive a pr...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 497, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “When” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...nce is a complete parable in this case. When I was a collage ‎student I work in a co...
^^^^
Line 3, column 566, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... I work in a construction project. I was one of the supervisor agents. We had two...
^^
Line 3, column 950, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'has'.
Suggestion: has
...ncreted ‎collapsed suddenly. This event have bad effect and waste a lot of money in ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 115, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[1]
Message: The adverb 'Never' is usually not used at the beginning of a sentence.
...aspect at all works is the ‎time index. Never don't imagine quickly work don&apo...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 479, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lower flowed in their products, whereas, workers with high speed ‎prodution have ...
^^
Line 5, column 810, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...e success in their personal works ‎too. Therefore quikly work with low pericious could wa...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 270, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...e cast risks at the other hand, this is a exactnes method that don't ‎waste ...
^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, hence, if, may, second, so, therefore, whereas, for example, in short, in my opinion, in my view

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 52.1666666667 65% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2242.0 1977.66487455 113% => OK
No of words: 431.0 407.700716846 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20185614849 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55637350225 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80617026302 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 212.727598566 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.519721577726 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 671.4 618.680645161 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6003584229 126% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 60.0770215699 48.9658058833 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.2307692308 100.406767564 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5769230769 20.6045352989 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.76923076923 5.45110844103 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 5.5376344086 181% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.88709677419 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.312898787691 0.236089414692 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0872047728045 0.076458572812 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100679005402 0.0737576698707 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.219454451284 0.150856017488 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.104780935093 0.0645574589148 162% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 11.7677419355 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 58.1214874552 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.58 10.9000537634 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 86.8835125448 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.002688172 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.