TPO 21 integrated writing
The reading discusses that cultivating genetically modified trees provide some benefits. The author listed three reasons to support this idea. However, the lecture finds all the reasons dubious and states they have serious problems hence, she presents some evidence to refute all reasons.
First, the author points out that these modified trees are harder compared with natural trees, so they live longer. In contrast, the speaker casts doubt on this issue by standing that resistance to the particular condition does not make sure survival. Indeed, when the climate would change the least resistant trees will die. Genetically modified trees are uniform to environmental challenging so all will die. Though, some wild natural trees can survive.
Furthermore, the reading passage indicates that genetically modified trees have some economic benefits, as they grew faster, they produce more products and also need fewer pesticides. On the other hand, the speaker declares that they want more charges, inasmuch as the farmer can collect the seeds of wild trees but every time they want to plant genetically modified trees they have to buy seeds. Thus, this idea is rejected.
Last but not least, the author illustrates that they restrict from overexploitation of wild true and satisfy the demands for wood. On the contrary, the speaker dismisses this idea and depicts that genetically modified trees grow more aggressively and compete for the soil nutrient, sunlight and other resources with the wild trees. Therefore, all these reasons are rebutted by the lecturer.
- TPO 19 integrated writing 65
- TPO 20 integrated writing 76
- tpo 25, integrated writing 80
- TPO 24 independent writing 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In order to be well-informed, a person must get information from many different news resources.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 412, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Though” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ironmental challenging so all will die. Though, some wild natural trees can survive. ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, so, therefore, thus, in contrast, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 10.4613686534 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 18.0 30.3222958057 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1329.0 1373.03311258 97% => OK
No of words: 245.0 270.72406181 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42448979592 5.08290768461 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95632099841 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55985734713 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579591836735 0.540411800872 107% => OK
syllable_count: 398.7 419.366225166 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 57.1123132654 49.2860985944 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.9285714286 110.228320801 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5 21.698381199 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 7.06452816374 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.379888302686 0.272083759551 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128612787612 0.0996497079465 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103052365982 0.0662205650399 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.234295265093 0.162205337803 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0654441699725 0.0443174109184 148% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.3589403974 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.86 12.2367328918 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 63.6247240618 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.