Traffic and accommodation problems are increasing and government should encourage some businesses to move from cities to rural areas. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this policy?
Traffic and accommodation issue has frequently generated a great deal of heated debate amongst citizens from the four corners of the world. It is advisable that the governments should incentivize various corporations to relocate from major cities to the countryside. This essay will shed some lights on the merits and demerits of this prevailing policy.
There is no shadow of doubt that the reestablishment of firms in rural areas can bring individuals insurmountable plus points. The first obvious positive aspect is that the burden on the demands for state-of-the-art public infrastructure is likely to be alleviated. In reality, this policy will leave more space in metropolis, facilitating the construction of buildings and houses, which by all means mitigates the ever-increasing accommodation problems. This also results in a reduction in the level of air pollution in densely-populated areas by virtue of a marked decline in industrial waste from various factories. What is more, this relocation would do wonders to the well-rounded development, especially in terms of economy in sparsely-populated regions. While these enterprises will be able to make use of the cheap workforce, rural manpower also get more access to a broad range of occupational opportunities; thereby sustaining their own better livelihood.
However, it is also irrefutable that potential downsides also persist for the followers of this policy. First and foremost, the main drawback is that the process in which a business firm is resettled in the countryside requires extravagant costs, striking a blow against its financial status. As a matter of fact, reestablishment is inextricably linked with extra spending on new recruitment of the workforce, operation as well as construction phases. Besides, there is a great prospect that these conurbations are restricted not only access to the mainstream market but also a supply of mandatory materials and a network of like-minded partners. As an unfavorable consequence, productivity, and then the annual revenue of these enterprises stand a good chance of decreasing significantly.
From the aforementioned points, albeit the resettlement of corporations from metropolis to the countryside poses both opportunities and challenges, my view is that these firms should compromise with this policy in a sensible manner to acquire the most desirable output.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-14 | quynhhtrangg2512 | 89 | view |
- The bar chart shows the results of a survey which asked people the causes of crime 73
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001 78
- An increasing number of professionals, such as doctors and teachers, are leaving their own poorer countries to work in developed countries. What problems does this cause? What solutions can you suggest to deal with this situation? 89
- The chart below shows the percentage of adults of different age groups in the UK who used the Internet everyday from 2003 to 2006. 73
- The chart below shows the percentage of adults of different age groups in the UK who used the Internet everyday from 2003 to 2006. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 212, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a sensible manner" with adverb for "sensible"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...irms should compromise with this policy in a sensible manner to acquire the most desirable output. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 271, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r to acquire the most desirable output.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, however, if, so, then, well, while, as a matter of fact, as well as, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2030.0 1615.20841683 126% => OK
No of words: 362.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.60773480663 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36191444098 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.50236155051 2.80592935109 125% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 176.041082164 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604972375691 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 633.6 506.74238477 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.0600600191 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.333333333 106.682146367 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1333333333 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.2 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20167580471 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0562403338633 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.051201368818 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121201644684 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0699187401733 0.056905535591 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 50.2224549098 60% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.55 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.24 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 124.0 78.4519038076 158% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.