The graph below shows the population change between 1940 and 2000 in three different counties in the U.S. state of Oregon. Columbia, Yamhill, Washington
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
<span id="docs-internal-guid-4abe2952-7fff-066a-1ce8-04ad746a6c6f"><p dir="ltr" style="line-height:1.38;margin-top:0pt;margin-bottom:0pt;"><span style="font-size: 14pt; font-family: Arial; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); background-color: transparent; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; vertical-align: baseline;">The given line graph provides information from the research into the population of three distinguish county in the state of Oregon over a sixty-year period between 1940 and 2000.</span></p><br><p dir="ltr" style="line-height:1.38;margin-top:0pt;margin-bottom:0pt;"><span style="font-size: 14pt; font-family: Arial; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); background-color: transparent; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; vertical-align: baseline;">Overall, according to the data, Washington prevailed in the number of citizens while the other counterparts followed a similar pattern.</span></p><br><p dir="ltr" style="line-height:1.38;margin-top:0pt;margin-bottom:0pt;"><span style="font-size: 14pt; font-family: Arial; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); background-color: transparent; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; vertical-align: baseline;">To be specific, in 1940, Washington’s population was approximately 75 thousand people. This figure gradually increased to more than 120 thousand people after 30 year. After witnessing a dramatic upsurge, there were nearly 255 thousand residents lived in the county in the end of twentieth century.</span></p><p dir="ltr" style="line-height:1.38;margin-top:0pt;margin-bottom:0pt;"><span style="font-size: 14pt; font-family: Arial; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); background-color: transparent; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; vertical-align: baseline;">Turning to the remaining counterparts, both Yamhill’s population and Columbia’s population experienced insignificant rises. The former rose by about 15 thousand citizens while the latter rose for just more than 7 thousand of people. In the second half of the period, both of these categories had their figures doubled. Despite of having these fluctuations, two counties had a roughly difference in their population.</span></p><div><span style="font-size: 14pt; font-family: Arial; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); background-color: transparent; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; vertical-align: baseline;"><br></span></div></span>
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 11
- The chart shows the number of students in the UK universities who completed (on time or late) failed to write and rewrote their dissertation in 1990, 2000, 2010. 11
- The graph below shows the pollution levels in London between 1600 and 2000.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 11
- Around the world many adults are working from home and more children are beginning to study from home because technology has become cheaper and more accessible Do you think this is a positive or negative development Give reasons for your answer and includ 89
- The graph shows Underground Station Passenger Numbers in London.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 2286, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('roughly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('difference') instead of another adjective.
...ng these fluctuations, two counties had a roughly difference in their population.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, second, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2329.0 965.302439024 241% => Less number of characters wanted.
No of words: 244.0 196.424390244 124% => OK
Chars per words: 9.54508196721 4.92477711251 194% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95227774224 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 11.3536477747 2.65546596893 428% => Word_Length_SD is high.
Unique words: 127.0 106.607317073 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.520491803279 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 576.9 283.868780488 203% => syllable counts are too long.
avg_syllables_per_word: 2.4 1.45097560976 165% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 40.0 22.4926829268 178% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 463.506712165 43.030603864 1077% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 388.166666667 112.824112599 344% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 40.6666666667 22.9334400587 177% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.83333333333 5.23603664747 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 1.0 3.83414634146 26% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0405973055488 0.215688989381 19% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0164717611935 0.103423049105 16% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.017267438125 0.0843802449381 20% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0405973055488 0.15604864568 26% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0819641961636 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 43.9 13.2329268293 332% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -36.8 61.2550243902 -60% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 20.3 6.51609756098 312% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 28.3 10.3012195122 275% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 39.0 11.4140731707 342% => Coleman_liau_index is high.
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.96 8.06136585366 124% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 40.7170731707 165% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 80.0 11.4329268293 700% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 18.0 10.9970731707 164% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.0658536585 163% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum two paragraphs wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.