More and more people are using computers and electric devices to access information, therefore there is no need for printed books and magazines and newspapers on paper. To what extend you agree or disagree?
The proliferation of modern technology have already tremendously subverted our life, we constantly find alternations for our traditional ways of life, and our ways of reading is among one of them. Personally, I appreciate such change as it contributes to both environmental protection and effective-reading.
With the transformation from paper-based physical book to the material available on smart devices, there is no need for choping down trees in the forest and could significantly decrease the plants that produce paper. The urge of prohibiting deforestation has already calling for us to reuse the textbook as well as drive up the books’ price, therefore, actively utilizing computer, tablet, kindle for reading purpose would definitely help alleviating the current press. Besides, the worldwide e-book resource online make possible a high degree of knowledge spreading and effective utilizing. Since books from all over the world could be downloaded on personal equipment and supports copy and delete, less troubles are suffered when it comes to a specific material in short supply.
Our eager of reading could be more easily satisfied with a kindle at hand. The modern technique overcame the traditional shortcoming of our knowledge access method, being limited by space. There’s no need for carrying the heavy reference books or writing scripts on commuting buses, a laptop or even a tablet could be competent enough for our dispatching. While traditionalists who are akin to physical book may suspect the flexibility of note-taking. The truth is, thankfully, modern technique facilitates take notes in a more neat and efficiency way, by providing different format of highlighting symbols and supporting handwriting, enabling reader to grasp the key point and understand the essay in shorter time.
In general, considering the benefits that e-book reading brings, why should we deny its popularizing?
- Some people say that in the modern age it is unnecessary to teach children about the skill of handwriting. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 11
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology.Discuss both these views a 89
- Some people think climate change has a negative impact on business, while others think that it provides more business options. Discuss both view and give your own opinion. 96
- In some countries, the difference in age between parents and children is generally greater than it was in the past. Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages? 56
- In some countries, the difference in age between parents and children is generally greater than it was in the past. Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages? 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 445, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[5]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to alleviate' or 'alleviate'.
Suggestion: to alleviate; alleviate
...r reading purpose would definitely help alleviating the current press. Besides, the worldwi...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 706, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun troubles is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...equipment and supports copy and delete, less troubles are suffered when it comes to ...
^^^^
Line 9, column 58, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ing could be more easily satisfied with a kindle at hand. The modern technique overcame ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 362, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...e competent enough for our dispatching. While traditionalists who are akin to physica...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, if, may, so, therefore, well, while, in general, in short, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1642.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.60409556314 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20766824582 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.668941979522 0.561755894193 119% => OK
syllable_count: 509.4 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.3620143463 49.4020404114 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.833333333 106.682146367 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4166666667 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.91666666667 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142838131767 0.244688304435 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0476760829214 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0387370088955 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0708095292031 0.151304729494 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0482804548543 0.056905535591 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.5 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.11 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.5 9.78957915832 169% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.