The charts below show what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full-time work did after leaving college in 2008.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons were relevant.

Essay topics:

The charts below show what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full-time work did after leaving college in 2008.

Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons were relevant.

Submitted by Noah1997 on Sat, 01/18/2020 - 10:54

The two bar graphs illustrate what graduate and postgraduate pupils in the United Kingdom did in 2008, when they chose not to go into regular full-time jobs after finishing college.

Overall, both graduates and postgraduates preferred further education over everything else. In contrast, the second most popular option was doing a part-time job, while unemployment and voluntary work seemed to take the last place in the chart.

First of all, 29,665 undergraduates, who did not plan on taking up a full-time job, went on to pursue higher studies. However, 17,735 chose to do part-time work, while 3,500 volunteered their skills. Also a big portion remained unemployed.

Lastly, the most number of postgraduates (2,725) also perused further studies. Similar to graduates, second most chosen option was a part-time job, while volunteering was the least chosen task. Furthermore, 1,625 postgraduates stayed unemployed in 2008.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-18 Noah1997 56 view
2020-01-07 pateldhruv1708 61 view
2019-12-24 rm21co 89 view
2019-12-24 rm21co 67 view
2019-12-07 MHT 78 view
>>> More users practiced this topic >>>
Essay Categories
IELTS Writing Task I - IELTS Academic
Essays by user Noah1997 :
>>> more essays by the user >>>

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 201, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
..., while 3,500 volunteered their skills. Also a big portion remained unemployed. La...
^^^^
Line 7, column 187, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to task'
Suggestion: to task
...while volunteering was the least chosen task. Furthermore, 1,625 postgraduates staye...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, however, lastly, second, so, while, in contrast, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 18.0 33.7804878049 53% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 786.0 965.302439024 81% => OK
No of words: 142.0 196.424390244 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.53521126761 4.92477711251 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.45201032557 3.73543355544 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96385184755 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.697183098592 0.547539520022 127% => OK
syllable_count: 225.0 283.868780488 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.372539442 43.030603864 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.3333333333 112.824112599 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.7777777778 22.9334400587 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.66666666667 5.23603664747 185% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204199583513 0.215688989381 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0761839797951 0.103423049105 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0707087717203 0.0843802449381 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130013277816 0.15604864568 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0731960869733 0.0819641961636 89% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 11.4140731707 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.