The fist chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household.The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons were relevant.
The pie charts illustrate two things. First one shows how energy is being consumed by an average Australian home. Second one depicts the amount of greenhouse gas emitted as a direct result of that energy consumption.
Overall, a big chunk of power is being used up for heating homes and water for domestic use. However, greenhouse gas emitted by all the work mentioned in graph shows variation, because water heating and appliances take the lead in that category.
Firstly, the energy usage by an average home for heating is the most, at 42 percent. It is followed by water heating at 30 percent, while house hold appliances take the third place. The least amount of energy used was on cooling surprisingly, at only 2 percent.
Secondly, the hazardous gas emissions was topped by water heating, at 32 percent. Emitting gasses closely behind that was everyday home gadgets at 28 percent, whereas heating the homes came at third place. The least amount of polluting gasses were produced by cooling homes, at only 3 percent.
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems, as well as practical problems.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 78
- In some countries the average weight of people is increasing and their levels of health and fitness is decreasing.What do you think are the causes of these problems and what measures could be taken to solve them? 89
- Longer life spans and improvements in the health of older people suggest that people over the age of sixty-five can continue to live full and active lives.In what ways can society benefit from the contribution that older people can make? 56
- The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients, all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons were relevant. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, second, secondly, third, whereas, while, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 858.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95953757225 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53861882114 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.578034682081 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 265.5 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.5821837334 43.030603864 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.0 112.824112599 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.7272727273 22.9334400587 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.45454545455 5.23603664747 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187302940621 0.215688989381 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0843575687448 0.103423049105 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0721276796429 0.0843802449381 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133757127079 0.15604864568 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10279760565 0.0819641961636 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 13.2329268293 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.3012195122 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.19 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.4329268293 52% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.