The graph below shows the global sales of different kinds of digital games from 2000 to 2006.
The chart shows the global sales of different kinds of digital games from 2000 to 2006. The sales of these games are displayed in dollars.
On the chart we can see the biggest volume of selling was by handheld games. In each of the six years shown, no other type of game came even close in selling so much. They were being sold the most during 2006 for 18 billions of dollars in total.
In the first year, other than the handheld games, only games sold were made for consoles. They were sold for volume worth almost 6 billions of dollars, but still did not come even close to number of handheld games that year, which sold in total for nearly 12 billions of dollars.
The next year, online games started being sold aswell. During their debut year,in total they made around half a billion dollars in sales. In the year 2002, mobile phones finally joined the market. They sold for total of 1 billion dollars.
Overall, we can spot the trend of slow increase in total volume of games sold. The exception to the rule were console games. The first year of their selling was also the highest in terms of volume. After 2000, volume of their sales gradually declined. Their lowest was 3 billion dollars in 2006, half of the amount sold in the 2000.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-23 | dolzoo | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-21 | stefan ielts | 67 | view |
| 2019-11-29 | Kamal1993 | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-09 | Muhammad Waleed Khan | 78 | view |
| 2019-09-08 | Milan karki | 73 | view |
- Nowadays parents are sending their children on trips abroad for educational purposes. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this? 89
- A person’s worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions. Old-fashioned values, such as honour, kindness and trust, no longer seem important.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 73
- A person’s worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions. Old-fashioned values, such as honour, kindness and trust, no longer seem important.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 78
- People nowadays are used to disposable items meaning that they use things for short time and throw them away. What do you think is the cause of this and what problems can it lead to? 84
- Some people think that the development of technology helps to reduce crime, while other people think it encourages crime. Discuss both sides and give your opinion. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 214, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '18 billion'.
Suggestion: 18 billion
...ere being sold the most during 2006 for 18 billions of dollars in total. In the first year, ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 130, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '6 billion'.
Suggestion: 6 billion
... They were sold for volume worth almost 6 billions of dollars, but still did not come even cl...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 257, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '12 billion'.
Suggestion: 12 billion
...at year, which sold in total for nearly 12 billions of dollars. The next year, online ga...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 79, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , in
...ing sold aswell. During their debut year,in total they made around half a billion d...
^^^
Line 15, column 106, Rule ID: WERE_VBB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'where' or 'we'?
Suggestion: where; we
...f games sold. The exception to the rule were console games. The first year of their ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, if, so, still, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1034.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 227.0 196.424390244 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.5550660793 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88156143495 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 1.92155338327 2.65546596893 72% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.52422907489 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 294.3 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 8.94146341463 179% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 22.4926829268 62% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.0732496702 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 64.625 112.824112599 57% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 14.1875 22.9334400587 62% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.875 5.23603664747 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 12.0 4.09268292683 293% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194032176554 0.215688989381 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0878222831645 0.103423049105 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.182910210891 0.0843802449381 217% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175492587788 0.15604864568 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.242685636573 0.0819641961636 296% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.1 13.2329268293 54% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 82.65 61.2550243902 135% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.2 10.3012195122 50% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 8.58 11.4140731707 75% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.11 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.4329268293 52% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.9970731707 69% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.