People nowadays are used to disposable items meaning that they use things for short time and throw them away. What do you think is the cause of this and what problems can it lead to?
Throughout recent years, people in general got used to throwing away their items after a short period of use, relativly to the past. There are a lot of factors which caused this and consequences of this, nowadays common, practice can be harmful for our enviroment and society.
As a result of our technological and manafacturing advancements, production of disposable things has never been higher. Today, for an example, an average person has numerious sets of clothes which he can wear every day, and most of those clothes get thrown away after a year of use. Shopping for clothes, among other things, has become a weekly habit for most of the population. In comparison, about 100 years ago, an average person had only two or three suits to wear and was buying new ones quite rarely. People became more materialistic and are not happy with the things they already own. Due to this, they will buy more things than they need while spending large sums of money.
Consequently, large scale manafacturers are making products which are of a much lesser quality than before. They exploit people’s greed additionaly contributing to the problem of disposing items, because items will not last as long anyways. This leads to a wide variety of problems. Firstly, a large amount of toxic waste is created, which damages natural enviroments. Furthermore, we have severe cases of large and famous companies abusing third world countries’ labours, in order to produce as many goods as cheaply as possible while harming basic human rights.
In conclusion, human morals have been violated as well as natural enviroment, due to obsession and carelessness of most of today’s population. People are focused about what will they wear and what car will they drive, instead of dealing with imporant problems concerning our whole society and our planet ecosystem’s health itself.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-21 | stefan ielts | 77 | view |
- People nowadays are used to disposable items meaning that they use things for short time and throw them away What do you think is the cause of this and what problems can it lead to 77
- The graph below shows the global sales of different kinds of digital games from 2000 to 2006. 67
- Some people think that the development of technology helps to reduce crime, while other people think it encourages crime. Discuss both sides and give your opinion. 84
- People nowadays are used to disposable items meaning that they use things for short time and throw them away. What do you think is the cause of this and what problems can it lead to? 84
- Restrictions On Ownerships Of Mobile Phones 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 305, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ter a year of use. Shopping for clothes, among other things, has become a weekly ...
^^
Line 5, column 501, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[3]
Message: The adverb 'rarely' is usually not used at the end of a sentence.
...s to wear and was buying new ones quite rarely. People became more materialistic and a...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
anyway, but, consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, so, third, well, while, in conclusion, in general, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1589.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 306.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19281045752 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84069461596 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.640522875817 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 488.7 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.9536323175 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.933333333 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.66666666667 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 8.67935871743 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.283168128177 0.244688304435 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.078796255501 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0696455287716 0.0667982634062 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162458690178 0.151304729494 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0820483284973 0.056905535591 144% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.