The given table illustrates the number of british people (measured in percentages) who used the bus in five different countries in different categories between 2009-2011.
Overall, the largest percentages of people who travelled by bus in the UK, went on shopping. On the other hand, the work categories has the lowest rate at each year in the table.
Regarding the table, it is clear that, every year people have been used more bus during shopping time, at 65%, at 56% and just over a half respectively. Similarly, the London citizens, also have travelled more by bus when they visit friends at 19% in 2009. After that, it remained steady till next year and has been showed some increased by four per cent in 2011.
It can be seen that, only least percentages of human beings travelled by bus in work at five per cent in 2009 and at 2% in 2010. However, in 2011, no one has been travelled by bus as compared to study along with day tour. Likewise, people of England who used bus in day trip was from 7% to 12% as well as, in study they have been used under a small minority throughout the period.
- The graph below shows the percentage of people who travelled by bus in the UK from 2009 to 2011 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 71
- The diagram below shows the stages in the recycling of aluminium drinks cans Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 74
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, likewise, regarding, similarly, so, well, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 905.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 200.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.525 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43079719434 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 268.2 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.0226252132 43.030603864 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.555555556 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2222222222 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 5.23603664747 191% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222220470771 0.215688989381 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101487275322 0.103423049105 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.070911831539 0.0843802449381 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148483596044 0.15604864568 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0283581433466 0.0819641961636 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.2329268293 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.29 11.4140731707 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.18 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.