sale of fossils
The provided material are concerned with the sale of fossils especially dinosaurs and other large vertebrates to private ownership for million of dollars. The author states that fossils selling have some negative points on science development and the general public. In contrast, the lecturer repudiates this point through several counterarguments that are as follows.
Initially, the author says that fossils should be in museums that everyone can see them. If people's accessibility to fossils becomes harder, public interests in fossils will decline. However, the lecturer explains that fossils selling induce people to see them more than museums. The purchase occurs in a public place that everyone can go.
Second, the writer thinks that fossils purchase affects scientists and students' accessibility to fossils and the commercial fossil buyers are wealthy enough that universities or museums can not compete with them. Yet again, the speaker underscores that scientists do not miss out on any important things. To purchase a fossil, some scientific identification must apply to it and the scientists are doing some detail examinations on fossils to approach this goal.
The final point of contention between the article and lecture is fossils destroying by collectors. The author says that most of the collectors are untrained people that can damage the fossils, but viably the scientists learn a lot about them and can observe a wide array of their characteristics. On the other hand, the speaker explains that maybe the collectors are untrained, but they unearth more fossils than scientists. If they did not discover this amount of fossils, many of the fossils would not discover and evidently scientists could not work on them.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-30 | Yam Kumar Oli | 3 | view |
| 2022-12-26 | YAGUT | 81 | view |
| 2022-11-11 | stupidfella | 73 | view |
| 2022-10-16 | Prabesh Dhakal | 68 | view |
| 2022-10-16 | _sta | 73 | view |
- sea otters declining 75
- Question: Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how the proposal discussed in the lecture would solve the specific challenges described in the reading passage. 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The government should spend more money on improving access to the Internet than on public transportation 70
- cedar 40
- tpo27 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 136, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
...ge vertebrates to private ownership for million of dollars. The author states that foss...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 252, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...e points on science development and the general public. In contrast, the lecturer repudiates t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, second, so, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 5.04856512141 198% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 7.30242825607 164% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1480.0 1373.03311258 108% => OK
No of words: 272.0 270.72406181 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.44117647059 5.08290768461 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84252761381 2.5805825403 110% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 145.348785872 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551470588235 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 439.2 419.366225166 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.1948831408 49.2860985944 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.714285714 110.228320801 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4285714286 21.698381199 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.64285714286 7.06452816374 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.372826932907 0.272083759551 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121799194144 0.0996497079465 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0937223142202 0.0662205650399 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.214617519307 0.162205337803 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0421248791834 0.0443174109184 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.3589403974 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 12.2367328918 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 63.6247240618 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.7273730684 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.