Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Human activity is making the earth a worse place to live. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
These days, there is a lot of debate going on about nature mother earth. In my opinion, I agree that manmade activities are destroying mother nature. I feel this way for two main reasons which I will explore in the following essays.
To begin with, human population is growing rapidly, which leading to deforestation and increase of pollution. In past few years, there was a huge growth of construction for companies, factory and so on, which means slowly we are breathing bad air. For instance, about a years ago, my country Bhutan, consider as one of the best place to live in the world. However, recent studies shows that due to inflow of more tourists into the country, many of the national park had to be close. People were polluting the areas with non-degradable things, on top of that, many villager are selling their land to build buildings for income. So that is why it's all natural resources are vanishing.
Secondly, due to human activities, most of the rare animals are extinction. On the other hand, wildlife homes were being destroy leaving them no place to go and left in hunger. For example, last year I was on vacation back in my country. I went for a trek with my friends near the national park. While we reach the base camp we saw a tiger coming towards the road side, probably looking for a water. The tiger seems that he/she haven’t ate anything for a months. As a result, after few weeks the tiger passed away at the centre. This example demonstrates that people are destroying home of animals.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that human beings are making it hard to live on the earth. This is because lots of high-rise buildings are coming up lead to deforestation, and because home of wildlife has disturbed.
- Television Appearances by University Professors 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Sometimes it is better to be dishonest Use specific reasons and details to support your answer 87
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more important to keep your old friends than it is to make new friends 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more important to keep your old friends than it is to make new friends 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more important to keep your old friends than it is to make new friends 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 269, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a year' or simply 'years'?
Suggestion: a year; years
... breathing bad air. For instance, about a years ago, my country Bhutan, consider as one...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 392, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'water'.
Suggestion: water
...rds the road side, probably looking for a water. The tiger seems that he/she haven&apos...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 459, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a month' or simply 'months'?
Suggestion: a month; months
...at he/she haven't ate anything for a months. As a result, after few weeks the tiger...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, second, secondly, so, while, for example, for instance, i feel, in conclusion, as a result, in my opinion, to begin with, on the other hand, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 9.8082437276 10% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 13.8261648746 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 43.0788530466 70% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 52.1666666667 84% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1450.0 1977.66487455 73% => OK
No of words: 306.0 407.700716846 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.7385620915 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60756464842 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 212.727598566 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.624183006536 0.524837075471 119% => OK
syllable_count: 449.1 618.680645161 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.1513660043 48.9658058833 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 76.3157894737 100.406767564 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.1052631579 20.6045352989 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.15789473684 5.45110844103 168% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.119064617462 0.236089414692 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0357631241388 0.076458572812 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0431936662838 0.0737576698707 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0775951183463 0.150856017488 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.026670836437 0.0645574589148 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.0 11.7677419355 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 58.1214874552 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.1575268817 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.92 10.9000537634 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 86.8835125448 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.