increase cane toads
the provided materials are concerned with increasing in cane toad population in Astralia that they had sent to that location to protect farmers crops. the author states that several measures have been proposed to stop increasing of these species.in contrast the lecturer repudiates this point through several counterarguments that are as follows:
initially the author says that a national fence coud stop the toad spread and prevent them to move and inhabit in other places.however the lecturer explains that the fence woud not stop cane toads espesially young group of them and their eggs and they could carry on the other side and this is not effective.
second the writer thinks that the toads could be destroyed by some of volunteers beacause they can easily be caught by hand and several traps yet again the speaker underscores that because she thinks that the hunters may be hent another species of animals instead of toads and it can be dangerous for other animals.
The final point of contention between the reading and listening passages is that reaserchers are developing a virus that is able to control the cane populations.the author says that the virus can effect only in toads and its not harful for other species and there is no concern about this.on the other hand the the speaker explains that sometimes some of these toads were captured and were sent in to south america for experiments or reaserches and if they were polluted with viruses it is so peril to other specious that live in south america and paly an important role in ecosystems.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
the provided materials are concerned with i...
^^^
Line 1, column 152, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...that location to protect farmers crops. the author states that several measures hav...
^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Initially
...counterarguments that are as follows: initially the author says that a national fence c...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Second
...other side and this is not effective. second the writer thinks that the toads could ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 63, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'some of', you should use 'the' ('some of the volunteers') or simply say ''some volunteers''.
Suggestion: some of the volunteers; some volunteers
...ks that the toads could be destroyed by some of volunteers beacause they can easily be caught by h...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 308, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...no concern about this.on the other hand the the speaker explains that sometimes some of...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 308, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...no concern about this.on the other hand the the speaker explains that sometimes some of...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, second, so, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.4613686534 153% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 7.30242825607 205% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 22.412803532 134% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1303.0 1373.03311258 95% => OK
No of words: 264.0 270.72406181 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93560606061 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59328926645 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537878787879 0.540411800872 100% => OK
syllable_count: 400.5 419.366225166 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.23620309051 49% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 4.0 13.0662251656 31% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 66.0 21.2450331126 311% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 169.338418559 49.2860985944 344% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 325.75 110.228320801 296% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 66.0 21.698381199 304% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 15.0 7.06452816374 212% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 4.19205298013 167% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.267974601844 0.272083759551 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.177302182703 0.0996497079465 178% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0924548508977 0.0662205650399 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156507537096 0.162205337803 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0691998139086 0.0443174109184 156% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 34.8 13.3589403974 260% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 12.95 53.8541721854 24% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 5.55761589404 234% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 27.9 11.0289183223 253% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 12.26 12.2367328918 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.44 8.42419426049 124% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 63.6247240618 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 28.5 10.7273730684 266% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 28.4 10.498013245 271% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.