TPO 16
The reading discusses that the science of archaeology was faced with serious problems and limitations in Britain and the author listed three problems to support this idea. However, the lecturer finds all the reasons dubious and presents some evidence to refute all of them.
First, the author mentioned that worthwhile objects were lost to construction projects. In contrast, the speaker asserts that before starting a construction site, the archaeologists examine the land and evaluate the value of it to decide to preserve it or not, then, the builders are allowed to build. Thus, this opinion is rebutted.
In addition, the author points out that many archaeologists think the financial support for their researches is insufficient. On the contrary, the professor casts doubt on this issue by standing that their financial supports are based on two roles. First, it is paid by the construction companies, and secondly, the whole new source of support for grad.
Last but not least, the reading passage proposes that careers in archaeology are limited. On the other hand, in direct contradiction to the reading, the professor claims that there is a lot of paid work because all the processes do by the archaeologists like evaluation, presentation, research and analyze the data. As a result, they increased the number of jobs. In conclusion, according to the listening material, the argument that archaeologists are confronted with limitations is unwarranted.
- stone balls 71
- When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively they are asked to work alone on projects. 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The opinions of celebrities, such as famous entertainers and athletes, are more important to younger people than they are to older people. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In the past, young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them; today young people are better able to make decisions about their own lives. Use specific reasons and examples t 76
- TPO50 integrated writing 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 335, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... build. Thus, this opinion is rebutted. In addition, the author points out that ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, second, secondly, so, then, thus, while, in addition, in conclusion, in contrast, as a result, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1237.0 1373.03311258 90% => OK
No of words: 231.0 270.72406181 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35497835498 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89854898053 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04506607946 2.5805825403 118% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 145.348785872 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.588744588745 0.540411800872 109% => OK
syllable_count: 365.4 419.366225166 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 12.0 8.23620309051 146% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 2.5761589404 272% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.5397475724 49.2860985944 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.083333333 110.228320801 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.25 21.698381199 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.5 7.06452816374 177% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230365186742 0.272083759551 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0694597036142 0.0996497079465 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0531153131274 0.0662205650399 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119392111622 0.162205337803 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.017699175297 0.0443174109184 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.3589403974 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 12.2367328918 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.09 8.42419426049 108% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 63.6247240618 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.