Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is important to read or watch the news presented by people whose views are different from your own rather than the news presented by people whose views are similar to your own.
There is no doubt to listen or watch the news from different people can help to understand better about many facts. There are a couple of reasons which distinct fallacious fact from incorrect facts. In this essay, we discuss this reason.
Many people believe that individuals have a variety of ideas about the news which can help to know better something that we have misleading what is true or false. By way of explanation, the society should be an open atmosphere for expressing every vison or idea and judge about everything which has happened in society. Also, mass media can adopt a vital point and play an important role. For example, in the USA, important news about the government of the USA has been expressed by CNN and FOX News. However, CNN opposes with FOX. Some times, people should agree on the positive and negative aspects of accurate news and they have to decide to agree on them. There is a fact behind this issue that mass media can re-engineer people's ideas about some significant evidence like president election which is happened every four years. So, different ideas have listened to all the people.
It seems that aggregation of own ideas can exert negative ideas in the significant context of all reliable people. Not clear to have a similar perspective of something which causes an unclear environment to appear in front of us. For instance, the vast majority of news has been forbidden by national media in a radical country like North Korea. Nonetheless, sometimes have seen people in this kind of country do not agree on foreign media which works in the context of free media. Besides, this job as a prominent policy has shown to reshape the characteristics of people. To sum up, an indifferent perspective about radical ideas is the decisive point in the free world of media.
Some experts critics that the majority of new is not clear and misunderstanding is the prominent element to chouse accurate news about something. By developing technology and growing mass media, it seems that bad news combined with fact and this can be dangerous for big decisions in society. Moreover, this issue is not acceptable for the author which guide the policy of the nation. In conclusion, we have to open our eyes to accept the correct thing in the virtual space.
In conclusion, the two factors often shape society's idea to agree with the majority of police, which will have been adopted by the government in the next decades.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-08-19 | zg1122 | 90 | view |
| 2020-04-23 | elva0723 | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-28 | amir_gha67 | 70 | view |
| 2020-01-28 | amir_gha67 | 60 | view |
| 2019-12-30 | prsghsm | 73 | view |
- The internet could revolutionize the world in the future if everyone could have easy access to all information that is available o the world wide web Do you agree or disagree with this statement 73
- The consumption of the world s resources oil and water etc is increasing at a dangerous rate What are causes and solutions 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is important to read or watch the news presented by people whose views are different from your own rather than the news presented by people whose views are similar to your own. 70
- Modern cultures around the world have become similar as compared to the past What are the main reasons for it Is it a positive or negative development 70
- Modern cultures around the world have become similar as compared to the past What are the main reasons for it Is it a positive or negative development 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 11, column 195, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...oping technology and growing mass media, it seems that bad news combined with fac...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, however, if, moreover, nonetheless, so, for example, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, no doubt, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 43.0788530466 51% => OK
Preposition: 68.0 52.1666666667 130% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2047.0 1977.66487455 104% => OK
No of words: 420.0 407.700716846 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87380952381 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52701905584 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59343646508 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 212.727598566 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.483333333333 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 646.2 618.680645161 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.0243619608 48.9658058833 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.0454545455 100.406767564 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0909090909 20.6045352989 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.68181818182 5.45110844103 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.136001393744 0.236089414692 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0425970129886 0.076458572812 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0428387927845 0.0737576698707 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0786983930492 0.150856017488 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0330971528586 0.0645574589148 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 11.7677419355 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 10.9000537634 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 86.8835125448 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.