It is more harmful to compromise one's own beliefs than to adhere to them.
Belief is a vast and great term, indeed. So, to protect some ones belief is a crucial phenomenon in order to the way of development and prosperity. But at the same time compromise is a great player according to the above statement to protect some ones belief. In my opinion the preference of competitive is most fruitful in the path of development and prosperity from the range of individual level to the world arena.
Firstly, technological development is a daily phenomenon in our 21st century. And in this field the development is more eye catching and crystal because of different technological firms competitive outlook. Their criteria is prerequisite phenomena towards our livelihood change and prosperity. For example, symphony, a mobile company developed a feature to their mobile and they do better impact in business and to supersede their place another mobile or tech company develop another more featured mobile. Thus their inherent competition leads us to get more and updated product. But if there is absence such competition rather to agree their opponent product, then the world will be banal and prosaic place.
Secondly, in business field competition is more fruitful as well as business firm and in the meantime country economy. Because one policy granted will jealous another firm to take more advantages for customers. For instance, in Bangladesh, a well-known pharmaceutical named, Beximco is take a policy toward their employees wage increase and accruement their gratuity fund. As a rival of another top pharmaceutical company Square taking more good and compatible policy for their employees. Ultimately employee will be benefitted and their working felicity is rising. As a result, production increase and developments confirmed, due their rivalries rather than prosaic compromise.
Thirdly, in the fields of politics, competitiveness is always cast better for country’s people and it also shaped a good uprightness for politician. As example, In Bangladesh, during election time politician gives more promise for their people livelihood changes and people choose in between whose promise is more worthy than others. But if the scenarios is not like that, then the politician refinement in the way of competition is not feasible.
In conclusion, from, basic level to the highest level competition is good for society, person and the world to make it more betterment places. This competitive nature should be practiced rather than following submissive like agreement of compromise.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-29 | batterylow_123 | 58 | view |
| 2024-04-09 | guozhishan | 50 | view |
| 2024-04-03 | Zahid6400 | 50 | view |
| 2024-01-27 | LauraTing | 66 | view |
| 2023-11-07 | ibralieah1030 | 66 | view |
- In many organizations perhaps the best way to approach certain new projects is to assemble a group of people into a team Having a team of people attack a project offers several advantages First of all a group of people has a wider range of knowledge exper 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement To improve the quality of education universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- A little over 2 200 years ago the Roman navy attacked the Greek port city of Syracuse According to some ancient historians the Greeks defended themselves with an ingenious weapon called a burning mirror a polished copper surface curved to focus the Sun s 63
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones. 50
- In the 1950s Torreya Taxifoha a type of evergreen tree once very common in the state of Florida started to die out No one is sure exactly what caused the decline but chances are good that if nothing is done Torreya will soon become extinct Experts are con 88
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 507, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...y develop another more featured mobile. Thus their inherent competition leads us to ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, look, second, secondly, so, then, third, thirdly, thus, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.4196629213 32% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 14.8657303371 148% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 11.3162921348 18% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 33.0505617978 64% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 58.6224719101 73% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 12.9106741573 147% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2143.0 2235.4752809 96% => OK
No of words: 392.0 442.535393258 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.46683673469 5.05705443957 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44960558625 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03210641378 2.79657885939 108% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 215.323595506 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.520408163265 0.4932671777 106% => OK
syllable_count: 685.8 704.065955056 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.0952090946 60.3974514979 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.047619048 118.986275619 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6666666667 23.4991977007 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.2380952381 5.21951772744 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 10.2758426966 175% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.126130860991 0.243740707755 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0419702347781 0.0831039109588 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0428980102352 0.0758088955206 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0758533075816 0.150359130593 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.035132601174 0.0667264976115 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 14.1392134831 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.1639044944 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.38706741573 105% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 100.480337079 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.