Claim: In any field — business, politics, education, government — those in power should step down after five years.
Reason: The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
The writer of the statement is of the idea that those who are in the power in any field such as politics, education, business, and government ought to step down every five years mainly because this is the only sure measure for any organization to revitalize via new leadership. I believe that the way of changing leaders and managers in all fields not only is possible but also can be detrimental to some enterprises like the business sector because it does not allow the leaders to develop a full understanding of the values and set apart with the staff. However, the author’s claim is true in the matter of innovativeness.
If the leader is doing well in his enterprise, there is no need to change the leader simply because the organization is taking advantage from him/her leadership, and the organization’s goals are well-achieved. For example, if a principal of a school brings good discipline for the school and is successful in academic achievements as well as extra-curriculum performances, they should be allowed to stay in their position due to the fact that students and academic staff benefits from their superb leadership.
A leader will not be successful without the support of his organization. He should provide confidence with his organization and set a rapport with the staff which it takes quite a long time to in the system. Since people cannot just accept readily a new person in the workplace, let alone new buss, it needs at least 10 years for them to build a rapport with his members. Therefore, in a short period of time, it seems quite impractical to achieve a good, mutual relationship.
The author’s viewpoint is quite true in the area of innovativeness and decision making. Vigor and determination might be missing in the leaders after several years in power. Sometimes the hardship of the job various obstacles would undermine a leader's dedication and interests in the same position, or they might think of their decisions as superior to others and they do not need a revision on their action and decision. Hence, in a few cases, we should accept the writer’s point.
In conclusion, the frequent changes in the leadership do not necessarily benefit the organization as if they are leading an enterprise in its best approach, as well as it takes a long time to fully become familiar with staff potentials and build a good relationship with them. However, this change might be essential in the novelty of organizations.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 394, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...with his members. Therefore, in a short period of time, it seems quite impractical to achieve ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 244, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'leaders'' or 'leader's'?
Suggestion: leaders'; leader's
...job various obstacles would undermine a leaders dedication and interests in the same po...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, so, therefore, well, at least, for example, in conclusion, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 33.0505617978 94% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 58.6224719101 99% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2047.0 2235.4752809 92% => OK
No of words: 415.0 442.535393258 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93253012048 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51348521516 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04287454533 2.79657885939 109% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 215.323595506 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.534939759036 0.4932671777 108% => OK
syllable_count: 639.0 704.065955056 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 23.0359550562 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 88.7354620331 60.3974514979 147% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.466666667 118.986275619 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.6666666667 23.4991977007 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.26666666667 5.21951772744 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172500693724 0.243740707755 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0515533663879 0.0831039109588 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0729038793849 0.0758088955206 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0901087148505 0.150359130593 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0784910281986 0.0667264976115 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 14.1392134831 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 48.8420337079 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 12.1743820225 103% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 12.1639044944 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 100.480337079 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 28.5 11.8971910112 240% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 12.8 11.2143820225 114% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 79.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.