To reverse a decline in listener numbers, our owners have decided that WWAC must change from its current rock-music format. The decline has occurred despite population growth in our listening area, but that growth has resulted mainly from people moving here after their retirement. We must make listeners of these new residents. We could switch to a music format tailored to their tastes, but a continuing decline in local sales of recorded music suggests limited interest in music. Instead we should change to a news and talk format, a form of radio that is increasingly popular in our area."
With the information provided, the assumption leading to conclusion remains unfounded. This argument is well presented yet far-fetched. This assumption claims that WWAC want to change format due to increasing listener number. Indeed owners want to switch format according to their taste. Hence, this conclusion is ill-founded.
The primary assumption underlying that the author's assumption is that there is a considerable amount of decline. Nevertheless, he fails to preclude other possibility that amount of degree is considerably crucial. As a matter of fact, it has suffered 1% or 99% decline. Indeed, a modicum of diminish is inconsequential, whereas, a tremendous amount of decline is highly pivotal and effective. Want of such prudent answers makes the author assumption full of holes. So, to reinforce the argument, the author should have discussed about detail of amount of decline which is greatly imperative without a shadow of doubt.
Furthermore, the author of the assumptions assumes that due to lack of interest this problem has occurred. However, he fails to take the other possible reason into account that it might be possible that there is a variety of factors for this event like the price has risen, the customer download it, or they obtain through different source. As we all know that plagiarism is greatly common in the current era. So, to reinforce the argument the author should have discussed about major of reason this decline.
Moreover, the author of the statement avers that changing format is the most significant solution for this event. Without considering and ruling about that presence other entertainment such as Internet, TV, computer can replace with music. It might be possible that a plethora of people attract to this new source for pleasure. Inasmuch as, there is a variety technology for amusement in the contemporary, we cannot indicate that music or changing format can be pivotal. S, to reinforce, the argument the author should have discussed about other source of enjoyment.
In short, as discussed the conclusion cannot be tenable. The author should have discussed about detail of this event such as degree of decline, other source of entertainment, informing about detail of price which is immensely indispensable .On the other hand to make a rigid conclusion is very myopic observation method. After all, feckless attempt with a fallible method could be noting a fool's errand.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-14 | neha shethia | 35 | view |
| 2019-12-06 | harshit kukreja | 69 | view |
| 2019-11-19 | didirou | 55 | view |
| 2019-11-09 | anshika mishra | 55 | view |
| 2019-11-05 | ramsay | 50 | view |
- A person should never make an important decision alone. 70
- In surveys Mason City residents rank water sports (swimming, boating, and fishing) among their favorite recreational activities. The Mason River flowing through the city is rarely used for these pursuits, however, and the city park department devotes litt 50
- If people have the opportunity to get a secure job, they should take it right away rather than wait for a job that would be more satisfying. 70
- Nations should suspend government funding for the arts when significant numbers of their citizens are hungry or unemployed.Reason: It is inappropriate—and, perhaps, even cruel—to use public resources to fund the arts when people's basic needs are not 30
- Knowing about the past cannot help people to make important decisions today. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 227, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Indeed,
...rmat due to increasing listener number. Indeed owners want to switch format according ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 44, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
... primary assumption underlying that the authors assumption is that there is a considera...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 342, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...r they obtain through different source. As we all know that plagiarism is greatly ...
^^
Line 9, column 240, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...f price which is immensely indispensable .On the other hand to make a rigid conclu...
^^
Line 9, column 242, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: On
...price which is immensely indispensable .On the other hand to make a rigid conclusi...
^^
Line 9, column 391, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'fools'' or 'fool's'?
Suggestion: fools'; fool's
...ith a fallible method could be noting a fools errand.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, hence, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, well, whereas, after all, in short, such as, as a matter of fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.6327345309 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.9520958084 85% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 11.1786427146 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 13.6137724551 103% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 28.8173652695 108% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 55.5748502994 97% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 16.3942115768 110% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2055.0 2260.96107784 91% => OK
No of words: 387.0 441.139720559 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31007751938 5.12650576532 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43534841618 4.56307096286 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88411683537 2.78398813304 104% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 204.123752495 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.501291989664 0.468620217663 107% => OK
syllable_count: 629.1 705.55239521 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 4.96107784431 161% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.76447105788 114% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.70958083832 185% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.22255489022 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 19.7664670659 116% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.8473053892 70% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 52.9460259464 57.8364921388 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.347826087 119.503703932 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8260869565 23.324526521 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.26086956522 5.70786347227 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.25449101796 114% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.20758483034 122% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 6.88822355289 116% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.67664670659 107% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0867734087243 0.218282227539 40% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0263245548953 0.0743258471296 35% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0316359586188 0.0701772020484 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0507101118664 0.128457276422 39% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0252386937057 0.0628817314937 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 14.3799401198 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 48.3550499002 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.197005988 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.22 12.5979740519 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.32208582834 107% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 98.500998004 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 12.3882235529 40% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.1389221557 75% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.9071856287 84% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.