The government is spending a lot of money to discover life on other planets. Some people think that the government is wasting money and should spend more money addressing the problems of public.
To what extent do you agree?
Life on planets other than earth could be possible due to advances in modern technology and scientists are exploring ways to find out home for people to stay in the upcoming years. Some people consider that public sectors should be prioritized in terms of funding rather than squandering money in space exploration. This essay agrees with the above view and will discuss this issue before coming to a conclusion.
First of all, funding should be provided in public sectors to improve infrastructure, transport system and educational facilities. As a matter of fact, to improve country as a whole in terms of economic as well as social development, government should allocate monetary resources to enhance public sectors such as constructing bridges and more pathways to mitigate congestion problems. Also, educational services should be financed in areas where children cannot pursue studies because of poor economic conditions to make them educated and better individual. Therefore, it clearly validates aforementioned reason why government should give importance to solve public problems first.
In addition to the above statement, government healthcare sectors need to be advanced with latest technology and employment should be taken into account for better development. To explain this further, poverty-stricken people suffer from health hassles which cannot be diagnosed at an early stage due to lack of technical equipments. Not to mention, government sectors should take care of people living in countryside and confronting issues regarding unemployment. To tackle this issue, more industries and jobs should be facilitated to avoid migration from rural to urban areas resulting in crowded places. Hence, it clearly states my agreement side.
On the contrary, people opposing the above perspectives believe that researchers are providing a new world to live and abide in. Thus, government should allocate money in space exploration programmes. To simplify, scientists need special equipments and technologies to visit other planets such as space shuttles and satellites for telecommunication. All these could be possible if scientists have enough money to spend on. For example, scientists have already planned and explored moon to live there in future as existing resources are diminishing day by day on earth. this is exorbitantly expensive and to recover this, government support is required. However, I nullify this by saying that despite of finding life in cosmic planets which might not be adaptable and comfortable due to lack of facilities there, other areas need more funds.
To conclude, although the idea of researching planets to live a life there is advantageous to some extent, community health and development should be given more importance.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-02-09 | Sarabjeet 9119 | 78 | view |
- Internet has emerged as a new source of information and knowlrdge This led many people to think that this new technology will ultimately replace book and printed words How far do you agree with the statememt 84
- While your friend was away on vacation you stayed in his apartment While you were there you dropped an expensive bowl and broke it Write a letter to your friend In your letter explain what happened apologize for the accident tell your friend how you plan 73
- A lot of places in the world rely on tourism as a main source of income Unfortunately tourism can also be a source of problems if it is not managed correctly Describe the advantages and disadvantages of tourism in the modern world Do you think that benefi 50
- Some parents buy their children a large number of toys to play with What are the advantages and disadvantages for the child of having a large number of toys 67
- Some people say History is one of the most important school subjects Other people think that in today s world subjects like science and technology are more important than history Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 88
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 414, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...is issue before coming to a conclusion. First of all, funding should be provided...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 87, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'with the latest'.
Suggestion: with the latest
... healthcare sectors need to be advanced with latest technology and employment should be tak...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 570, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...es are diminishing day by day on earth. this is exorbitantly expensive and to recove...
^^^^
Line 7, column 842, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ies there, other areas need more funds. To conclude, although the idea of resear...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, hence, however, if, regarding, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, in addition, such as, as a matter of fact, as well as, first of all, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 7.85571142285 242% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 70.0 41.998997996 167% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 8.3376753507 276% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2354.0 1615.20841683 146% => OK
No of words: 424.0 315.596192385 134% => OK
Chars per words: 5.55188679245 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53775939005 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03746849286 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 242.0 176.041082164 137% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570754716981 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 732.6 506.74238477 145% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.4224630318 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.7 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.4 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246366922744 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0742078776906 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0595781004548 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13759097232 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0330949358268 0.056905535591 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.91 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 122.0 78.4519038076 156% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.