The table below gives information about the population in Australia and Malaysia in 1980 and 2002.
The table compares two different countries, namely Australia and Malaysia, in terms of residents between 1980 and 2002.
Generally, at every indicator in Malaysia taller than that of Australia, excepting the rate of female and old people. Especially, the ration genders in both nations were almost perfectly balanced.
According to the table, the difference in total citizens in both territories were minimal, at only about 1 million. However, the difference was around 5 million in 2002, as the population in Malaysia almost doubled. Noticeable, the proportion of people aged over 65 in Malaysia were only approximately 4% in both years, while the figures for Australia were higher much, at 9.6% and 12.4% in 1980 and 2002 respectively.
As can be seen from the table, the Male and female population in Australia remained unchanged in both years. Meanwhile, the figures for Malaysia increased slightly and decreased mildly by 0.3% in 2002, respectively. The percentage of birth in Malaysia was twice as high as that of Australia (3.2% and 2.2% compared to 1.5% and 1.3%). As a result, the average annual population growth in Malaysia also higher.
- The table below shows the weight of people in a particular country from 1999 to 2009 78
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of government spending on roads and transport in 4 countries in the years 1990, 1995, 2000, 2005. 84
- The best way to solve the world s environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- The only way to improve safety of our roads is to give much stricter punishments for driving offences What extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Fresh water has always been a limited resource in some parts of the world Today however growing worldwide demand has made this a global problem What are the causes of the increased demand and what measure could governments and individuals take to respond 56
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, while, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 966.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22162162162 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85989369819 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594594594595 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 292.5 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.1603679111 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.6 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.1 5.23603664747 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.313237992027 0.215688989381 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121644838913 0.103423049105 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0721217843455 0.0843802449381 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194718787724 0.15604864568 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0768908277527 0.0819641961636 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, while, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 966.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22162162162 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85989369819 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594594594595 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 292.5 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.1603679111 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.6 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.1 5.23603664747 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.313237992027 0.215688989381 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121644838913 0.103423049105 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0721217843455 0.0843802449381 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194718787724 0.15604864568 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0768908277527 0.0819641961636 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.