When a country develops its technology, the traditional skills and ways of life die out. It is pointless to try and keep them alive.
Technological development of a country makes the nation to feel proud. The advancement of science is being deviated because of some people. This argument has both positives and negatives according to my thoughts which can be explained in the following passage.
On one hand, the improvement of modern methods always allows people to develop their career. At the same time, technological development in a country increases its employment opportunities to individuals. Also, it reduces the poverty of a nation. Many advantages are there with improvement in technology. Accordingly, people will never forget their customs wherever they live. Additionally, innovations have reduced human effort in many activities. For example, after existence of appliances like washing machines, vacuum cleaner’s humans reduced most of their effort in a daily life.
On the other hand, irrespective to technology young generation are getting attracted to different clothing style and fashion. This is all because of various advertisements and movies. But, advancement in technology never spoil a nations tradition. In addition, there are some people who use this innovation in a negative way. People go in wrong ways to make money like selling harmfull drugs. Consequently, few people are even using social websites for many bad activities. Indeed, Individuals are using their knowledge for wrong works. For instance, people are texting bad words to some people through internet. The government authorities should take proper regulations and action on these negative people who are spreading unpleasant actions in society.
After having considered all the above discussed points, we can finally draw a conclusion that technology development in a country never makes the people to leave their culture. Individuals are getting motivated to different lifestyles because of other avigation’s such as internet and films.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-11 | SUSANNA PETROSYAN | 78 | view |
| 2020-10-03 | Chaman Bhardwaj | 73 | view |
| 2020-07-28 | mindfulielts | 84 | view |
| 2020-02-17 | saipriyanka | 84 | view |
| 2020-02-17 | saipriyanka | 84 | view |
- Should governments make decisions about people s lifestyle or should people make their own decisions 67
- The qualities and skills that a person requires to become successful in today s world cannot be learned at a university or other academic institutions To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- In many professional sports there is an increase in the number of athletes using banned substances to improve their performance what are the causes of this phenomenon and what are some of the possible solutions 89
- Although more and more people read news on the internet newspapers will reman the most impotant source of news Do you agree or disagree 57
- Scientists have been warning from many years about environmental protection and we should limit the use of energy in daily lives What are the reasons for that How to encourage people to take an interest towards environment protection 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 230, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...advancement in technology never spoil a nations tradition. In addition, there are some ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 308, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a negative way" with adverb for "negative"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...are some people who use this innovation in a negative way. People go in wrong ways to make money ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, consequently, finally, if, so, for example, for instance, in addition, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1628.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.69230769231 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0646768377 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615384615385 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 519.3 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 20.2975951904 64% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.0272666443 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.5238095238 106.682146367 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.619047619 20.7667163134 66% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.7619047619 7.06120827912 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.107637485502 0.244688304435 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0326312905053 0.084324248473 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0521873975121 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0698367039803 0.151304729494 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0164885423141 0.056905535591 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 41.36 50.2224549098 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.13 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.1190380762 71% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.