Many famous sports players advertise sports products. Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages?
There is no iota of doubt that, a number of well-known players are doing different types of product advertisements. This phenomenon is offering multifarious benefits to the players. However, sometimes a couple of problems emerge due to the same. In this essay, we will throw some light on the advantages and disadvantages of this trend.
To begin with the bright side of endorsements by sports persons. Firstly, players can promote certain products in a better way because they themselves use some of these items in their line of work. For example, Lionel Messi does the advertisement of an energy drink, which he consumes while playing the game. Because of this reason, his endorsement of the product sounds genuine. Secondly, players can make money by doing various types of advertisements. In general, advertisement companies give approximately 5-10 million dollars to the players who work for them. This is a great opportunity for them to convert their popularity and brand value into wealth.
On the flip side of the coin, there are a handful of nasty consequences of endorsements as well. Primarily, this could take away the players’ focus of the game. For instance, last year, Sakib al Hasan, a renowned Bangladeshi cricketer, was not able to perform as expected in the Asian Cup. As a result, some people assert that this happened because he was featured in myriads of advertisements at that time, which took his concentration away from the match. Furthermore, athletes could become a money minded if they do a lot of advertisement campaigns. The result of this could be devastating for the players and ruin their game play.
In conclusion, there is no doubt that popular players are advertising several products and this phenomenon has some obvious drawbacks and benefits which are given in the above paragraphs. All in all, it is up to the players to decide whether or not they should do these types of advertisements.
10 linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-06 | nhatkhang111 | 78 | view |
| 2024-07-23 | Ahmad_off | 67 | view |
| 2024-06-17 | MEBC Class | 84 | view |
| 2024-06-03 | BuiGiaHan | 89 | view |
| 2024-04-08 | reverjae | 73 | view |
- Some people think parents should supervise their children s activities closely while others believe children should have more freedom Discuss 85
- Some people think parents should supervise their children s activities closely while others believe children should have more freedom Discuss 67
- Due to so many young people dropping out from schools the rate of unemployment is increasing and it affects our society in different ways In your opinion how can this situation be improved 73
- Many famous sports players advertise sports products Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 84
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 43, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'handfuls', 'handsful'?
Suggestion: handfuls; handsful
... the flip side of the coin, there are a handful of nasty consequences of endorsements a...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 235, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
... all, it is up to the players to decide whether or not they should do these types of advertise...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in general, no doubt, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1662.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 330.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03636363636 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97767018706 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584848484848 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 504.9 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.8376233403 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.1 106.682146367 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.35 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.284629354979 0.244688304435 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0740536342258 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0494733049593 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136735054451 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0741647824631 0.056905535591 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.0946893788 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 50.2224549098 127% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 43, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'handfuls', 'handsful'?
Suggestion: handfuls; handsful
... the flip side of the coin, there are a handful of nasty consequences of endorsements a...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 235, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
... all, it is up to the players to decide whether or not they should do these types of advertise...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in general, no doubt, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1662.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 330.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03636363636 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97767018706 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584848484848 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 504.9 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.8376233403 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.1 106.682146367 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.35 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.284629354979 0.244688304435 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0740536342258 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0494733049593 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136735054451 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0741647824631 0.056905535591 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.0946893788 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 50.2224549098 127% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.