There is no room for doubt that the huge advancements of technological devices have changed significantly the way children spend their leisure time since the rise of the digital era. This essay solely argues that the advantages of this situation outweigh its drawbacks. This essay will first demonstrate about its advantageous impact on the way students learn today and give an analysis of its drawback which leads to an unhealthy lifestyle.
On the one hand, it is more likely that the education takes advantage of technology to give students a fresh approach to lessons by applying distance-learning method. This type of learning method is thoroughly handy because students could learn and review their lessons at home at a click of a mouse without attending schools, which is time-consuming for parents to pick their children to schools. Furthermore, the modern learning approach helps children to prevent toxic diseases, which makes their parents less worry about being infected. Taking China as a prime example, where the outbreak of coronavirus epidemic occurs, and therefore, its ministry of education and training forces to close all schools and switches to the distance-learning method to help students to review their lessons.
On the other hand, despite the rapid development of cutting-edge technology, it is widely assumed that children are leading to an unhealthy sedentary lifestyle. This is because children are easily addicted to novel modern devices such as tablet, smartphone, television, laptop and so on, resulting in less engaging in physical activities as well as chronic diseases like intense back pains or severe headaches. For instance, a survey conducted by the Vietnamese government reveals that children have a tendency to enjoy playing online games over 8 hours daily, which is the primary driver to an increasing number of short-sighted children today.
On balance, the fact that the advantage of modern technologies clearly outweighs the flawed argument that this enhances the children's ability to self-studying.
- US government expenditure on research 78
- The bar chart below shows different methods of waste disposal in four cities: Toronto, Madrid, Kuala Lumpur, and Amman. 73
- The best way to solve the world’s environmental problem is to increase the price of fuel. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 84
- The graph shows the information about the international conferences in three capital cities in 1980 2010 Summarise the main character and make comparison where relevant 78
- The charts below show the results of a survey about what people of different age groups say makes them most happy. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 687, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'closing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'force' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: closing
...nistry of education and training forces to close all schools and switches to the distanc...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, so, therefore, well, for instance, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1738.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 318.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.46540880503 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0070852345 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59748427673 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 532.8 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 49.1070680476 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 158.0 106.682146367 148% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.9090909091 20.7667163134 139% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.81818181818 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.240557549121 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0922692474739 0.084324248473 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0778231499739 0.0667982634062 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149929166291 0.151304729494 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0638926333207 0.056905535591 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.8 13.0946893788 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.6 50.2224549098 69% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.04 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.34 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.