The availability of food in developing and developed countries have seen a tremendous increase in recent decades. Unfortunately, so the amount of food thrown away has increased, both in commercial and housing. In this essay, I will discuss the reasons for this phenomenon and how it can be addressed.
Firstly, the main reason for the increase in wastage of food is the lack of planning skills among the masses. People are so busy; they do not plan about their healthy meals but relay on quick bites. For example, most of the working professionals do not do their groceries on a regular bases, but only buy the stuff for the next day or believe in eating outdoors. Due to this, the food cooked in houses is wasted, and more dependence on restaurants gives rise to commercial wastage.
Secondly, restaurants are keen to serve fast and fresh, so they keep half-cooked food, which is perishable, and there is limited time to consume it. However, the readiness of restaurants results in wastage. The restaurants do plan their meals, but there are chances that they might not reach the daily target of consumption. Moreover, they are even reluctant to give away the food items as it might affect their reputation.
The solution to the causes, however, is quite simple. The NGOs can be active, as they can spread awareness for the proper give away methods. For example, an Indian Ngo Feeding India has initiated a campaign to collect the food from the restaurants or houses and distribute it to the poor and needy humanity. Even the government can take the initiative in making some laws about the whole menu to be cooked on a given day according to the customer’s visits. Moreover, individuals can become more conscious and wisely plan their meals to nullify the wastage, or they can directly give away the left food to the poor.
To conclude, food is essential for living, and its wastage is a sin. So, humans should be extra conscious and make the best of the food rather than throwing it in the bins.
- The bar charts below show the Marriage and Divorce Statistics for eight countries in 1981 and 1994 Write a short report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below Write at least 150 words 61
- The maps below compare 2 floor plans of one trade conference held in 2009 and 2010 55
- Scientists believe that computers will become more intelligent than human beings Some people find it is a positive development while other think that it is negative development Discuss both views and give your opinion 61
- Young people are often influenced in their behaviours and situations by others in the same age This is called peer pressure Do the disadvantages of peer pressure outweigh the advantages 73
- The diagram below shows information about the amount of money spent on alcohol and drugs Summarize the info by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1666.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 347.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80115273775 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31600926901 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.656175814 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.536023054755 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 513.0 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 0.809619238477 741% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.173531379 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.5555555556 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2777777778 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.27777777778 7.06120827912 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.14176764712 0.244688304435 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0462972422845 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0456132231351 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0854804762331 0.151304729494 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0430102686456 0.056905535591 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.56 12.4159519038 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.