TPO 41
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays.
There is no shortage of opinion on the matter how the public attitude towards the professors changed. In my opinion, the respect for the teachers have diminished for the last several years. I feel this way for two main reasons, and I will develop these ideas in the subsequent paragraphs.
Firstly, in today's world, education is heavily based on the handouts and books rather than the professors. Therefore, influence of the books and reading materials on the learners are greater than the pedagogues, which lowers the reputation of the tutors. By contrast, several years ago, the education was primarily based on the teaching of the professors, which is the reason why they were appreciated by learners and their parents. I have to admit that my opinion on this matter was influenced by my own experience. When I was younger, there were few handouts and materials associated with the mathematics. Thereby, only people who can help me was the mathematics teacher of the high school whom I respected greatly. Fortunately, there are many invaluable materials on the every branch related to the mathematics, which helped me to study topics independently of the any professor. Moreover, nowadays, I would respect the books rather than any professors. Drawing from my own experience, many adequate books were published profoundly last few years, which made possible for students to study things without help of the pedagogues.
Secondly, in the past, pedagogues were allowed to berate students to nurture them. On the other hand, currently, teachers will be heavily reprimanded by the public and parents if they berate pupils when students perform something wrong. Therefore, teachers are not capable of nurturing young people, which occasion the public opinion that they are incompetent on teaching students. For example, when I was in the preschool, I strived to succeed in the class because I dreaded that my pedagogue will berate me. Furthermore, this fear lead me to have the highest grade later, which makes me and my parents to appreciate my tutor. Conversely, teacher of my younger sister could not motivate my sister to study by heart because the teacher is not available to be harsh to her students. For this reason, my parents started criticizing the tutor for not teaching well. As a result, the pedagogues are too benevolent to teach students because of the fear that people would criticize them.
In consequence, professors are less appreciated by the public nowadays. This is because they are not the main source of learning anymore, and cannot utilize harsh method to teach students.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-14 | Vivian Chang | 73 | view |
| 2023-03-26 | Crash | 73 | view |
| 2023-02-25 | can111 | 60 | view |
| 2023-02-14 | reza_fattahi | 70 | view |
| 2023-01-06 | minammah | 73 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement When classmates or colleagues communicate about a project in person instead of by e mail they will produce better work for the project 70
- It is sometimes said that borrowing money from a friend can harm or damage the friendship Do you agree Why or why not Use reasons and specific examples to explain your answer 76
- Imagine you could improve the town where you live by changing one important thing about it Which of the following would you choose to do Build additional parks Construct more libraries Improve public transportation Use specific details and examples in you 70
- Some people prefer doing sports on their own such as running while others like to do sports in groups Which one do you prefer 70
- Pets should be treated like family members Do you agree or disagree with this statement Give reasons to support your opinion 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, first, firstly, furthermore, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, for example, i feel, as a result, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 15.1003584229 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 43.0788530466 97% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2182.0 1977.66487455 110% => OK
No of words: 424.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14622641509 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53775939005 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79173562947 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 212.727598566 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.48820754717 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 672.3 618.680645161 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.7617242909 48.9658058833 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.1818181818 100.406767564 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2727272727 20.6045352989 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.27272727273 5.45110844103 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.102231949516 0.236089414692 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0332886676477 0.076458572812 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0284370167822 0.0737576698707 39% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0587312567009 0.150856017488 39% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0255610360685 0.0645574589148 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 11.7677419355 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 10.9000537634 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 86.8835125448 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.