Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The
environmental issue is too complex to be handled by the individual
These days, we hear from everywhere about environmental problems such as greenhouse gas effects and the melting of glacial rocks in polar areas. It is crucial to find an appropriate solution for these problems because our lives are threatened by these phenomenons. Now there is a controversial question as to whether this issue is too sophisticated to be handled by people or not? While some groups are an opinion that it is not individuals’ job to consider this issue, personally, I believe we can take remarkable steps toward solving this problem on our planet. I have several reasons, both of which will be mentioned in the following paragraphs.
The first reason that juts out of my mind immediately pondering this issue is the fact that each procedure, no matter what, has different sections which must work properly in order to reach its goal. Now, one of the most important problems in the world is environmental issues. And people ought to do their duty as a part of this system. In other words, if each person focuses on his responsibility regarding the environment, these actions will gather together, and they will make a considerable difference. There is a phenomenon called a Butterfly effect, which is about the effect of a butterfly’s wings motion in a point of the earth on the other side of it. To shed more light on this topic, the scholars believe if a butterfly moves its wings on japan's coastland it can make huge waves in Canada's beaches. Therefore, our actions about the environment, no matter how little, is capable to make huge changes in surroundings condition. We don’t need to do any extraordinary action, only a few ones, both of which are putting trashes in the garbage and separating our recycle bin trashes.
Secondly, the fact of conservation the environment consist of various actions with different difficulty level, some of them are preliminary and others are sophisticated ones. To make the whole procedure more efficiently it is great to divide different levels of actions and devote each of them to particular groups. In this way, individuals can handle the minor activities, for instance, do not leave their food can on the ground when they do a picnic, by doing so, governments are be able to focus on intricate problems such as global warming and greenhouse gas effects instead of thinking about methods about effective ways to clean the jungle and green land from peoples trashes. We cannot expect the government to do anything about big problems if we do not do our little duties. To sum up, we are going to face catastrophic conditions in few years because of the weather’s change all around the world and in order to find a practical solution the scholars and governments must put their efforts into that. So as a human, it is our duty to handle some little activities about our environment which is simple but important because in this way we can help our governments to ponder about those complicated problems.
To make the long story short, according to the aforementioned arguments we have different types of problems with different levels of importance. Now as a human, we must do our duty regarding little matters which if we do not consider them properly, they can make catastrophic consequences. in this way, we help scholars and governments to focus on more intricate problems. We can make a world a better place and enjoy living on it, in unity there is strength.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-10-29 | porteghale Abiasli | 76 | view |
| 2020-10-25 | Abbas.ghaffari | 83 | view |
| 2020-03-10 | farzaddanaeii | 73 | view |
| 2020-03-06 | Pakshid | 84 | view |
| 2017-11-01 | imanattari | 37 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Famous entertainers and athletes deserve to have more privacy than they have now Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- TPO 35 Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- tpo34 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- competition among friends usualy has a negative effects on friendship agree or disagree 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 304, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
.... Now there is a controversial question as to whether this issue is too sophisticated to be h...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 751, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'japans'' or 'japan's'?
Suggestion: japans'; japan's
...lieve if a butterfly moves its wings on japans coastland it can make huge waves in Can...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 482, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
... a picnic, by doing so, governments are be able to focus on intricate problems suc...
^^
Line 4, column 212, Rule ID: IF_IS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'is'?
Suggestion: is
...our duty regarding little matters which if we do not consider them properly, they ...
^^
Line 4, column 290, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...hey can make catastrophic consequences. in this way, we help scholars and governme...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, regarding, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, as to, for instance, such as, in other words, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 15.1003584229 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 61.0 43.0788530466 142% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 87.0 52.1666666667 167% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2850.0 1977.66487455 144% => OK
No of words: 583.0 407.700716846 143% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8885077187 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.91379618374 4.48103885553 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90497277208 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 285.0 212.727598566 134% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.48885077187 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 893.7 618.680645161 144% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 63.4047817724 48.9658058833 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.913043478 100.406767564 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.347826087 20.6045352989 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.30434782609 5.45110844103 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.129646230881 0.236089414692 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0406908289835 0.076458572812 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0459307326946 0.0737576698707 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.084377225037 0.150856017488 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0322201061238 0.0645574589148 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 11.7677419355 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 58.1214874552 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 10.9000537634 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 122.0 86.8835125448 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.