Topic: The chart shows the waste disposal in one European country in four years 2005, 2006, 2007 and 2008
The bar chart illustrates on the amount of waste disposal in a particular European country annually from 2005 to 2008.
Overall, the amount of waste in landfill witnessed a gradual decrease whereas the figure for burning grew over a four year period.
In 2005, landfill accounted for the highest quantity of waste with exactly 1800 million tonnes. However, there was a sharp decline in the amount of waste disposed to landfill, and ending at 600 million tonnes, which was one third of the amount of garbage in 2005. Although during the first three years, discarding rubbish in landfill was the most ubiquitous way, the amount of trash in landfill was surpassed by that of burnt waste.
In the year of 2005, the quantity of burnt rubbish was approximately 500 million tones. Over the period from 2005 to 2008, burning waste method experienced a gradual rise and reached the peak of around 900 million tonnes. By contrast, the figure for trash went into sea climbed slightly and arrived at climax at 630 million tonnes before dropping to just below 600 million tonnes in the next year, ending at precisely 580 million tonnes in 2008.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-13 | Nhung yen | 78 | view |
| 2020-03-13 | emmaphamngoc | 73 | view |
| 2018-01-13 | o0olynero0o | 77 | view |
| 2018-01-12 | Baonhi | 57 | view |
- The map below shows the development of the village of Ryemouth between 1995 and present Write a report based on the map 67
- Topic The chart shows the waste disposal in one European country in four years 2005 2006 2007 and 2008 73
- The map below shows the development of the village of Ryemouth between 1995 and present Write a report based on the map 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...an country annually from 2005 to 2008. Overall, the amount of waste in landfill...
^^^
Line 7, column 287, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...for trash went into sea climbed slightly and arrived at climax at 630 million ton...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, third, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 951.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9274611399 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39239131463 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544041450777 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 268.2 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.8860060163 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.875 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.125 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.75 5.23603664747 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 1.13902439024 527% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222206925616 0.215688989381 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114684319741 0.103423049105 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0981867929788 0.0843802449381 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168107818949 0.15604864568 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.107009892069 0.0819641961636 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.