The bar graph presents the amount of domestic waste disposed of by one specific European nation from 2005 to 2008.
Overall, the amount of landfill waste was by far the most staggering one throughout the period. However, there were some prominent changes in the figure of each category.
On the one hand, the landfill where most of the disposal sessions occurred showed a downward march as a whole. Starting from a figure of 1800 million tonnes in 2005, three times as much as the amount of either burning waste or sea dumping waste, the degree of waste at landfill steadily decreased. It finally ended up ranked second in 2008, with just 600 million tonnes of total waste disposal.
The two other categories, on the other hand, reflected totally different patterns. The level of waste resulting from burning grew greatly, turning from the least common element into the highest one, with roughly 900 million tonnes. The number of disposal sessions taking place at sea was the most fluctuated one, although there was not much difference in its figure, remaining at around 600 million tonnes during the whole period.
- The chart below shows the waste disposal in 1 European country in four years 2005 2006 2007 and 2008 78
- Fewer and fewer people walk on a daily basis What are the reasons and how toencourage them to spend their time walking 61
- Fewer and fewer people walk on a daily basis What are the reasons and how toencourage them to spend their time walking 61
- The charts below give information on the ages of populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features an make comparisions where relevant 78
- c
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 232, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...t one, with roughly 900 million tonnes. The number of disposal sessions taking plac...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, if, second, so, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 933.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98930481283 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34858614954 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598930481283 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 277.2 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.2456075589 43.030603864 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.666666667 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7777777778 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 5.23603664747 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.149848362471 0.215688989381 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0658233327393 0.103423049105 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0668274350766 0.0843802449381 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111550601104 0.15604864568 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0824548016344 0.0819641961636 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.